| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened |
| From: | "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:42:11 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Disqualification would only apply to those who submit a score. Doug -----Original Message----- Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened Perhaps I just have not seen it before. Reading the CQ WPX Rules 2014: qt -- XII. A. Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Examples of unsportsmanlike conduct include, but are not limited to: ... 6. Running stations making more than 3 contacts without sending their callsign. unqt --- Thanks to the CQ WPX Contest Commitee. 73, Vlad VE3IAE --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened, Pete Smith N4ZR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Pre-NAS practice: NS Ladder Tonight, Bill Haddon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened, Martin , LU5DX |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened, Vladimir Sidarau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |