Just to clear the "air" a bit on this, there are many logs that have no qsos
removed and the claimed scores remain unchanged.
A quick look shows:
Claimed and
Call Final Q
N6ML 518
DP4M 505
LY3CY 495
GW4BLE 474
K1TR 423
F6EWX 397
OK2ILD 394
G4WGE 385
VE2AWR 371
VA3DX 356
K9MMS 350
It seems that this is not so rare at all.
73,
Bob W5OV
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mats Strandberg
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:59 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ
Amazing "performance" by the guys checking the logs of the QRP-section of
the contest I would say.
I have seen many dubious results in QRP during the years, but the CQWW 2010
results must compete in a very unique category.
Anything else than publishing of the two UBN-logs would be a big
dissapointment.
Please observe that I do not take any side in this debate. The winner could
definitely be the legitimate winner, BUT noone, and I mean noone, can manage
to keep the claimed scores unchanged...
If the CQWW CC lacks interest, skills or guts to fairly judge the
QRP-section, then better remove this category at all!
The efforts made by QRP-contesters are by no means less impressive than HP-
and LP-entries. These guys need the same kind of attention and detailed
checking as anyone else. A lot of things is going in behind the curtains in
QRP-contesting - therefore careful and EQUAL treatment of all top-scoring
stations should be compulsory.
73 and 72 / RA/SM6LRR, Mats
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|