Yes. It is certainly possible to achieve a "Golden Log", especially when
you operate >99% S&P.
Check out the logs for yourself!
http://www.cqww.com/cq-ww-ssb-2010.htm
Very impressive operating by the two of them! They deserve the trophies
that they each had won (#1 World & #1 Europe).
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Amazing "performance" by the guys checking the logs of the QRP-section of
> the contest I would say.
>
> I have seen many dubious results in QRP during the years, but the CQWW 2010
> results must compete in a very unique category.
>
> Anything else than publishing of the two UBN-logs would be a big
> dissapointment.
>
> Please observe that I do not take any side in this debate. The winner could
> definitely be the legitimate winner, BUT noone, and I mean noone, can
> manage
> to keep the claimed scores unchanged...
>
> If the CQWW CC lacks interest, skills or guts to fairly judge the
> QRP-section, then better remove this category at all!
>
> The efforts made by QRP-contesters are by no means less impressive than HP-
> and LP-entries. These guys need the same kind of attention and detailed
> checking as anyone else. A lot of things is going in behind the curtains in
> QRP-contesting - therefore careful and EQUAL treatment of all top-scoring
> stations should be compulsory.
>
> 73 and 72 / RA/SM6LRR, Mats
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|