| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? |
| From: | "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com> |
| Reply-to: | Vladimir Sidorov <vs_otw@rogers.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:12:22 -0400 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Yet another look at open logs. As a contest sponsor/adjudicator I have been asked several times to make logs open for the following reason: Let us go through logs and determine poorest operators so that we can AVOID WORKING THEM in the next contest (!!!). This is the least thing I wanted to see in the end of the day. Instead, more new people should be invited into contesting and amateur radio in general, and any activity of the newcommers should be by all means supported. That's why I for one don't really like the open logs' idea. 73, Vladimir VE3IAE --- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, David Kopacz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex Radio as in the Flex-5000 is it ready forPrime time Contesting ??? esp SO2R, Tobias Wellnitz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, David Kopacz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, K0HB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |