To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? |
From: | "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:00:40 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I agree with Hans' "fair use" statement. It isn't fair for others to be able to sift through the past logs of competitive station in order to figure out their strategy, particularly with regards to band changes and band openings. David ~ KY1V >In that vein, I believe that participant logs ought to be a private >transaction between the participant and the sponsor, and that "fair use" of >the log should not extend beyond that needed to score the contest. >73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, Pat Collins N8VW |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, David Kopacz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, Tom Haavisto |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step?, Vladimir Sidorov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |