CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: Dave/KA1NCN <dave@ka1n.cn>
Reply-to: dave@ka1n.cn
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Why disqualify the big gun?  Every station that works him as the opportunity to 
demand a signal report.  In fact, they have the duty!  Yet, in listening to a 
few stations giving serial numbers only this weekend (probably 3 or 4 hours in 
total), I never heard a single one ask for a signal report.    Secondly, I 
disagree with the notion that a report is entirely subjective.  The ?S? part, 
as I understand it, is supposed to be derived from whatever one?s S-meter is 
reading.  So, at a minimum, a third party, standing over the shoulder of the 
?giver? of the report would be able to verify that at a given moment a signal 
caused a certain S-meter to give a certain reading.
    73, Dave/KA1NCN dave@ka1n.cn

       
---------------------------------
Special deal for Yahoo! users & friends - No Cost. Get a month of Blockbuster 
Total Access now
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>