To: | "R.Measures" <r@somis.org> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa |
From: | Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | garyschafer@comcast.net |
Date: | Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:26:42 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
R.Measures wrote: > On Apr 17, 2005, at 2:38 AM, G3rzp@aol.com wrote: > > >>But what is the resolution of the S meter? > > > With the AGC off, and the RF gain backed down, there's plenty. The > step-attenuator method is the gold standard. With the AGC off, how does your S meter function at all? 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, G3rzp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, R . Measures |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, R . Measures |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, R . Measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |