Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Linear\s+loaded\s+whip\s+versus\s+base\s+\/center\s+loading\s+verticals\s+\/\s+shorted\s+Inv\s+L\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Linear loaded whip versus base /center loading verticals / shorted Inv L (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 21:33:14 -0700
"My question is: What is better for top, with non ideal ground/counterpoise (i normally park the motor home in good soil, and deploy 4 + quarter wave roof height radials). 1) 30 ft vertical linear lo
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00004.html (7,909 bytes)

2. Topband: Linear loaded whip versus base /center loading verticals / shorted Inv L (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:52:37 -0700
"With that in mind, I'd rate a linear loaded (helical loading) antenna dead last." == I consider a linear loaded antenna to be a conductor formed into a hairpin type of configuration, not a conductor
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00029.html (7,534 bytes)

3. Topband: Linear loaded whip versus base /center loading verticals / shorted Inv L (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 00:11:06 -0400
Actually a linear loaded antenna (assuming a helical wire the whole length) has about the same radiation resistance as somewhere between base and center loading. It ranks in somewhere that area for
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00030.html (8,093 bytes)

4. Topband: Linear loaded whip versus base /center loading verticals / shorted Inv L (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 22:56:09 -0400
We certainly have some vague or nebulous definitions in common use Earl!! Even if we are talking about linear loading as a folded section or hairpin, and not a continuously wound linear-loaded verti
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00038.html (8,331 bytes)

5. Topband: Linear loaded whip versus base /center loading verticals / shorted Inv L (score: 1)
Author: py2cw160@terra.com.br (py2cw160 "Mac")
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 00:20:37 +0100
Hi folks I experimented in many overnight car trips some inv L and short = verticals for low bands with excellent results. In one specific trip i = phone qso'd in 80m during an entire night trailing
/archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00126.html (7,824 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu