| To: | <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Linear loaded whip versus base /center loading verticals / shorted Inv L | 
| From: | k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com) | 
| Date: | Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:52:37 -0700 | 
| Tom, W8JI wrote: "With that in mind, I'd rate a linear loaded (helical loading) antenna dead last." ========== I consider a linear loaded antenna to be a conductor formed into a hairpin type of configuration, not a conductor wound helically for any of its length. I agree with Tom about helical loading, but I consider linear loading (as I define it) to be more efficient than a coil. 73, de Earl, K6SE | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: chicken wire ground screen (reply), Tom Rauch | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Re: Topband: chicken wire ground screen (reply), i4jmy@iol.it | 
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Linear loaded whip versus base /center loading verticals / shorted Inv L, Tom Rauch | 
| Next by Thread: | Topband: Linear loaded whip versus base /center loading verticals / shorted Inv L, Tom Rauch | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |