Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+K5P\s+signal\s+strength\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Carl Braun <Carl.Braun@lairdtech.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:48:42 +0000
At 1040z here in so cal the K5P station went from NIL to 599 on Topband. Maybe someone found the ON button for the amp? Carl AG6X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00295.html (6,420 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:18:12 -0500
Perhaps they are using RHR....Just Kidding! Art NK8X _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00297.html (7,429 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:23:49 -0500
Heard very well here in MD from 1120Z-1220Z on my west-facing pennant, deep fade at my sunrise to ESP. Working mostly JA's but trying for NA. (Although at least once K5P called for EU!) Tim N3QE ____
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00298.html (7,612 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Les Kalmus <w2lk@bk-lk.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:11:35 -0500
Apparently, they had problems tuning the Battle Creek Special and were using a SteppIR vertical the first day. That's been fixed and was what they were using today. It's bad enough they were working
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00314.html (8,746 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:20:11 -0400
I called K5P for four hours on 160 while at the same time nearby KH6AT was reporting my signal was 589 in Hawaii and even FW8JJ spotted me in the pile up. They were up to 579 most of the time and ste
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00318.html (10,058 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:22:17 -0500
Les, I am 100% sure, when they called for EU, that it was not intentional. I betcha they thought that function key did "CQ NA". I think they were doing a decent job working NA until JA sunset. Might
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00320.html (9,548 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:13:22 -0600
K5P had a big signal around 0900Z this morning. We had thunderstorms and the bands were very noisy but he came in over the top of that. He faded a little later on but still good copy. I worked him at
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00325.html (10,653 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Carl Braun <Carl.Braun@lairdtech.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:16:10 +0000
K5P announced QRX at 1513...20 minutes after my local SR. Very stron when QRX and being reported by other west coast stations. Now at 1517 still no return with no stations calling. Maybe a Latte brea
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00326.html (11,401 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Bill Breeden <breedenwb@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:30:46 -0600
K5P was solid copy here on the Mississippi Gulf Coast last night when I worked them at 0627z. Was running 500 watts from a K3 and KPA500 to an inverted "L" working against a single counterpoise raise
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00328.html (8,117 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: "Milt" <miltn5ia@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:37:41 -0700
K5P just came back from his QRX. He is VERY GOOD COPY, 529, at 1535 Z, here at Virden, NM. in DM52. The RX is an Elecraft K3 and the RX antenna is a 900' long 2-wire Beverage. This is one hour and 15
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00331.html (13,070 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:40:23 -0800
As promised, they were on at their sunset (around 0800Z) with a great signal, a fine op, and hearing well. There was an instant pileup, and I heard them working those with better stations east of the
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00344.html (8,908 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:48:38 -0800
Herb, My 160M antennas are comparable to yours. There are MANY times over the years when you've been more than 10 dB above my noise but you couldn't hear repeated calls with my 1,500W amp turned on.
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00347.html (9,095 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:55:31 -0500
Herb, I worked him at 7:24Z last night. (finally got my computer working, I was sans my computer for a couple days). His Tx 1.8255 My Tx 1.82711 The P3 showed the pileup so I listened to the split an
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00349.html (12,662 bytes)

14. Topband: K5P signal strength (score: 1)
Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:06:17 -0500
And what should they be working, in the hour before Western EU SR, JA No, USA No. Give us a break, or do I have to break yet another USA pile up for a new one. Just because an area of the World is au
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00351.html (8,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu