Mail Archive Search: <+from:w7iuv@yahoo.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w7iuv@yahoo.com: 103 ]

Total 103 documents matching your query.

41. Topband: Band condx (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 07:06:26 -0700 (PDT); This morning was probably the best I've seen the band in the last year, at least toward VK/ZL. The ZL digi was stronger than I've heard it in a very long time. VK3ZL was 569, little QSB and srtonger; /archives//html/Topband/2005-08/msg00001.html (6,774 bytes)
42. Topband: Morning noise (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:59:58 -0700 (PDT); As I write this a half hour before sunrise, the "noise" is a couple S-units above the noise floor on my NW Beverage. Much lower on the West wire and can't hear it at all on the SW wire. It probably i; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00074.html (7,101 bytes)
43. Re: Topband: Boring Report (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:15:47 -0700 (PDT); Everything here was best on the 30° Beverage, the 60° Bev was down noticeably. 20 EU's in the log last night, no dup's from previous days. 73, Larry - W7IUV DN07dg http://w7iuv.com __________; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00103.html (7,644 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: Very un-Boring report (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:09:21 -0700 (PDT); Looks like I missed th ebest part of the opening. Didn't get on until 0500z and then tired out quick and went to bed. Did manage to bag ES5TV for a new entity and several others I didn't work earlier; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00218.html (7,684 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: Take-Off Angle Question (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:27:12 -0700 (PDT); All the EU signals I've copied over the last ten days or so have been best on the 30 degree Beverage. They are all down on the the 60 degree beverage and nil on the 90 degree Beverage. The Inv-V at 7; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00247.html (7,765 bytes)
46. Re: Topband: Take-Off Angle Question (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:36:49 -0700 (PDT); I'd like to add a few "local" observations. Ap and Kp are good indicators for wide area conditions but I've had poor correlation to my local results on 160. The USGS has a magnometer site at Newport,; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00252.html (9,191 bytes)
47. Re: Topband: Receive antennas (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT); If your goal is to optimize the picture on your computer then by all means use 5/8 wave spacing. If you live 10 miles out from the nearest power line or computer, there is no question that 5/8 wave s; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00307.html (8,188 bytes)
48. Re: Topband: Receive antennas (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:31:13 -0700 (PDT); I disagree. I have looked at the EZNEC plots and I see the same thing and arrive at different conclusions. I see the nice nulls at 30 degrees elevation changing to peaks at 2 degree elevation. I see; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00316.html (10,103 bytes)
49. Re: Topband: Pennant/Vertical separation? (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:42:29 -0700 (PDT); Pat, as far away as you can is the short answer. Do you use elevated radials? If so place the pennant as far away from the radials as you can without regard to the tower. Elevated radials cause more; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00318.html (7,577 bytes)
50. Re: Topband: Not Boring Morning (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:35:44 -0800 (PST); I heard Charlie, but since I worked him a few days back, I just listened to Tree and another station call him. When Charlie sent QRT I sent my call a couple times to see if I could keep him intereste; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00026.html (8,372 bytes)
51. Re: Topband: Slinky vs. Loading (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:36:49 -0800 (PST); Charles, If you put the 300' wire ten feet in the air I can understand the poor performance. Short "Beverages" work best near the ground. When I was restricted to less than 300', I experimented with; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00060.html (8,501 bytes)
52. Re: Topband: Technology "QSO's" (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:34:41 -0800 (PST); I've been watching this thread for a while and mostly agree with what everyone has been saying. What is important to remember is that this is a HOBBY! We do it for enjoyment, relaxation, and personal; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00120.html (11,552 bytes)
53. Re: Topband: qrss & such (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:52:04 -0800 (PST); Jim and everyone, It has been my experience that PSK31 is a real piece of crap, just a toy. Standard Baudot RTTY is way better than PSK31 for real DX'ing. PSK31 for rag chewing, RTTY for digging in t; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00143.html (9,753 bytes)
54. Re: Topband: Technology "QSO's" (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:58:25 -0800 (PST); I suspect that if Stew were on the band today, he could work DXCC in a couple of good weekends. I also suspect he wouldn't much like what he would hear on the band these days. Lets see, it took me ab; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00161.html (10,108 bytes)
55. Re: Topband: roofing filter FT1000 (D) (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:38:16 -0800 (PST); Bert Hollander <pa7mm@wxs.nl> wrote: Hello, i am curious anyone has experience on topband with the new roofing filter from Inrad for the FT1000(D) series. I decided to upgrade my old FT1000 (see also; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00269.html (8,549 bytes)
56. Topband: Central WA report (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 08:18:55 -0800 (PST); This last month has been both exciting and frustrating. CQWW CW and last night were the highlights for me. I have been hearing EU's frequently at my sunset, but typically they can't hear me. During C; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00318.html (8,012 bytes)
57. Topband: Skew Path (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:35:14 -0800 (PST); Last night was unusual in that not only were the signals from Europe arriving here via skew path, I was also able to work a couple. Around 0530 I noted that all the European signals that were being s; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00335.html (7,391 bytes)
58. Topband: Morning EU (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:08:49 -0800 (PST); Just worked RA4LW at 1447z. Several other west coast guys also worked him. First EU I've ever heard in the morning from here. He was weak with lots of QSB. When he would fade down on NW Beverage, he; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00376.html (7,025 bytes)
59. Re: Topband: Morning EU (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:34:20 -0800 (PST); First of all, I can compute the GCB myself. I didn't want what the computer thinks, I want what others have experienced on the air. Second, RA4LW's lat/long is incorrect on QRZ.com. This is not unusu; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00381.html (7,737 bytes)
60. Re: Topband: Morning EU (score: 1): Author: Larry Molitor <w7iuv@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:41:10 -0800 (PST); Putting together the direct observations by Bob, N7UA, and the info from Bill, W4ZV, helps make sense out of my experiece. It would seem that while Bob, about 150 miles west of me, was hearing the EU; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00386.html (8,398 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]