Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W9UCW@aol.com: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Shunt Fed Tower Info (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW at aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Wed Aug 6 06:32:18 2003
Hi Bill, I sure agree with Earl, Don and Herb.....but I would stay away from Quarterwave radials. It's almost impossible to get more than one of them to carry any significant current. Try four eightw
/archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00018.html (7,823 bytes)

2. Topband:Shunt Fed Tower Info (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW at aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 7 19:47:33 2003
Referring to the K5IU paper on unequal currents in elevated radials, I was surprised and intrigued when Tom, W8JI, commented that: Reviewing the material, it seems to have a great deal of merit, base
/archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00030.html (7,845 bytes)

3. Topband: Re: 160 Meters Mobile Antennas (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW at aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Sun May 11 06:02:57 2003
Hi Les & Others, As my name and call have been dragged thru this thread several times, I feel like I'm a part of it. I'd like to comment. The main topic seems to be effectiveness or loss especially r
/archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00079.html (11,244 bytes)

4. Topband: Re: 160 Meters Mobile Antennas(Barry, W9UCW) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW at aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Sun May 11 17:40:53 2003
Well, if that were the case, how is it that the voltage rises so much from the bottom of the loading coil to the top? If the current is the same, that would mean that power is being created in the co
/archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00089.html (10,557 bytes)

5. Topband: 160 Loaded Vertical Antennas(Barry, W9UCW) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW at aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Thu May 15 06:08:33 2003
Hello again antenna fans out there in radio land! In our last episode, our hero was set upon by his nemesis, that dastardly villain from the deep......sorry, just kidding, it's not like that at all.
/archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00110.html (13,370 bytes)

6. Topband: Re: 160 Loaded Vertical Antennas (Barry, W9UCW) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW at aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Fri May 16 06:46:35 2003
I think you have a syntax problem in that sentence, but I recognize the formula. You said further: I think you have that right. Sounds correct to me, but what's your point? If you are alluding to mea
/archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00113.html (12,046 bytes)

7. Topband: Re: 160 Loaded Vertical Antennas(Barry, W9UCW) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW at aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Mon May 19 17:10:19 2003
Well Mike, Any 20" long coil that we used would have already been closewound and would have been for 160 or 75 if it had bigger wire. So to change it to a 5" long coil with the same inductance, we wo
/archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00128.html (7,703 bytes)

8. Topband: Propagation during the Stew Perry (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 08:04:19 EST
Openings to Europe are few and far between here in the south tip of TX. When I lived in No. Illinois I was envious of New England and the eastern seaboard. In the last 13 years I've added most of the
/archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00304.html (8,221 bytes)

9. Topband: 160 DX with limited resources (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:46:32 EST
There's been a thread on the Reflector concerning working DX on 160 with less than optimum resources. Some folks seem disheartened faced with the successes of the "Big Guns." I don't think they shoul
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00251.html (11,295 bytes)

10. Topband: ICE Broadcast filters (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:54:50 EST
I have seen references here, in QST, and on "Ham Links" about power capable rf filters with great specs (and prices) from "Industrial Communications Engineers" in Indianapolis. I can't seem to get th
/archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00098.html (7,750 bytes)

11. Topband: Chokes-Ferrite vs. air (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:59:56 EDT
Guessing at the number of turns in an air wound choke isn't necessary. Calculating the size is easy. Whether a choke is wire-wound (cored or air), coaxial wound, or "beaded", it should have a reactan
/archives//html/Topband/2001-06/msg00048.html (8,373 bytes)

12. Topband: Prospective QTH evaluations (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 09:06:26 EDT
When we were looking at properties here in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 12 years ago, we used our own vehicle to go to each site (much to the disappointment of the realtors) because we had an extensiv
/archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00074.html (8,117 bytes)

13. Topband: Re:Receiving Loops (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:34:44 EST
In a message dated 12/29/2003 11:01:01 AM Central Standard Time, topband-request@contesting.com writes: in high local noise, would it be advantageous to put a small receiving loop on top of a tower?
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00277.html (8,184 bytes)

14. Topband: Re:Notes on early JA to East Coast QSO's (W9UCW) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:38:55 EST
<Does anyone else have interesting info to share on this subject? <73, John W1FV Hi John, Although it wasn't as tough as the East Coast had it, I remember how hard it was to work the JA's in the earl
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00200.html (6,937 bytes)

15. Topband: Re: Top Band DXing Long Ago (W9UCW) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 07:57:02 EST
Hi Bob, As a 13 year old high school freshman in 1954, I found myself on 160 because the homebrew rig I had wouldn't oscillate above 75 meters and that band was full of AM kilowatts. Trouble was, my
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00293.html (8,340 bytes)

16. Topband: Re: 160 Nostalgia (W9UCW) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:23:17 EST
Yes, and he's a great host, too. I first worked him as PY1MGF in '71, and later that year as PY1DVG. He was always in there and I got a chance to see why. In 1978 I was working in Brazil where my co
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00314.html (9,470 bytes)

17. Topband: Aurora last night (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:54:36 EST
On a weekly 20m sked early Sunday eve, a buddy in Illinois mentioned the heavy aurora going on. After supper at about 0200 I wandered into the rig and tuned accross 160. I happened accross Tom, W8JI
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00045.html (7,913 bytes)

18. Topband: Strange Echo-LDE?...SDE? (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:51:18 EST
Yesterday morning from about 1030z to 1040z I was listening to Herb, KV4FZ call "CQJA" as he is wont to do at about his sunrise. Herb was particularly strong when I tuned on him, but I noted that on
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00166.html (7,055 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Full wave Loop on 160 (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:29:53 EST
<What is consensus of opinion re: full wave loop on 160. Cloud burner? Advantages ? <Disadvantages ? <Would only be 50' above ground. <Thanks for the input.. Robert WA3GGM < <And Tom said: " Loops ar
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00043.html (11,285 bytes)

20. Topband: Windows, Rules and Punishment (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:02:14 EST
Rules, more rules, windows, mutiple windows, complications, cops, referrees, arbiters, penalties, punishment, banishment, disqualification... what's next? It's the age of "It's not my fault that I'm
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00188.html (9,121 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu