Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+QTC\s+Scoring\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+QTC\s+Scoring\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] QTC Scoring (score: 1): Author: "Bill G. K3SV" <k3sv@direcway.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:29:37 -0500; If you get a call from a station that would be a "dupe", but he now has QTC traffic that they want to pass, here is what I did. I accept the "dupe" situation and take the QTC traffic. Can I assume th; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00127.html (7,044 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] QTC Scoring (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <ve3xd@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:41:50 -0500; Bill, That's exactly what will happen. Notice in the log window that Writelog shows the qso with a D for dupe but records all of the QTC information with the entry. You can scroll to the right to see; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00128.html (7,923 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] QTC Scoring (score: 1): Author: Werner Maier <werner@maiers.de>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 08:38:10 +0100; Bill, It's exactly what must happen. see <http://www.darc.de/referate/dx/fedcw.htm> (klick on rules, scroll down to QTC Traffic): --8<-- 7 QTC Traffic: Additional points can be achieved by QTCs. A QT; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00138.html (8,191 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]