Mail Archive Search: <+from:les.peters@ne.arris-i.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:les.peters@ne.arris-i.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy change come Jan-1st-2001 (score: 1): Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters); Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:22:49 -0500; The idea of charging a yearly fee for "Feature enhanced" upgrades is not new in the software industry. It happens frequently and allows enhancements to be released without delay. If you make any enha; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00148.html (13,914 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy change come Jan-1st-2001 (score: 1): Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters); Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:13:30 -0500; Tony, I purchased WL for a specific need (single op contesting w/DVK) no rig control, no networking, no spotting. As I upgrade my station and take advantage of more features, I would like to think th; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00151.html (17,431 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1): Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters); Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:46:53 -0500; Kent, I was confused as well and decided to call Ron (K5DJ) yesterday and ask him how he plans on supporting 10.22B/C (i.e. bug fixes). Ron made it perfectly clear that for those who are happy with t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00247.html (9,163 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] RIGBLASTER and DVK (score: 1): Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters); Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 09:32:29 -0400; I talked to Del K1UHF at a local hamfest this past weekend about the difficulty in using Writelog with the Rigblaster. The problem is that Writelog does not have the capability to control the Rigblas; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00074.html (13,507 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] RIGBLASTER and DVK (score: 1): Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters); Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 11:12:12 -0400; While it is true that for CW, RTTY, and digital modes Writelog can control the PTT line it does not have the capability to control it for SSB operation. If you look at the port setup menu you will no; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00077.html (10,502 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] RIGBLASTER and DVK (score: 1): Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters); Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 12:11:54 -0400; It appears the only way that you can control a PTT line via a com port is if your rig has an RS232 interface whose command set supports PTT operation (i.e. not via the mic connector). In version 10.1; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00079.html (12,720 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] RIGBLASTER and DVK (score: 1): Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters); Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 12:22:59 -0400; Thats a little criptic, so I have to select CW PTT for SSB PTT to work, OK I'll try that tonight. Is this documented somewhere, I checked the help file index searching on "dvk" and didn't find anythi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00081.html (10,506 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] wav files and writelog (score: 1): Author: les.peters@ne.arris-i.com (Les Peters); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:06:25 -0400; I noticed that myself, In the port setup menu I selected the wave file locate button and then located one of my wav files (so that WL knew the directory existed). Then I selected CW/RTTY/SSB Messages; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00145.html (9,242 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]