Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+inv\s+L\.\.\.\.data\.\.\.\.need\s+some\s+experience\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+inv\s+L\.\.\.\.data\.\.\.\.need\s+some\s+experience\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 inv L....data....need some experience.... (score: 1): Author: "John" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:16:09 -0600; My 137' inv L, with the vertical portion at 66' and 20 on ground radials show the following data at the base of the antenna. Resonant at 1820 KHz.... Z......100 ohms L......9.5 uH C......900 pf SWR w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00228.html (6,807 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inv L....data....need some experience.... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:19:39 -0800; I don't trust this data -- it doesn't make sense. First, 9.5uH and 900 pF resonates at 1.722 MHz. Second, if it's 100 ohms at resonance, that's a 2:1 VSWR, not 4:1. Third, 100 ohms at resonance for t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00229.html (7,772 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inv L....data....need some experience.... (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:44:41 -0500; I agree with K9YC, this data makes no sense. Perhaps your analyzer is effected by a nearby broadcast station. What SWR do you get by transmitting into it? John KK9A I don't trust this data -- it does; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00231.html (8,178 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]