Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@contesting.com: 1902 ]

Total 1902 documents matching your query.

101. [Towertalk] 100M-long boom Yagi for 20M (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:52:28 -0500
And one of the big problems with such antennas for contest use is that the 3 degree bandwidth is too narrow for optimum coverage in Europe, where you need to "bathe" as many potential contacts with a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00231.html (8,732 bytes)

102. [Towertalk] 100M-long boom Yagi for 20M -- correction (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:33:22 -0500
And one of the big problems with such antennas for contest use is that the 3 degree bandwidth is too narrow for optimum coverage in Europe, where you need to "bathe" as many potential contacts with a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00232.html (8,644 bytes)

103. [Towertalk] 100M-long boom Yagi for 20M -- correction (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:04:14 -0500
Aw bleep -- 3dB BEAMwidth 73, Pete N4ZR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00236.html (8,197 bytes)

104. [Towertalk] 100M-long boom Yagi for 20M -- correction (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:19:20 -0500
Yes, and 21+ dB (including ground reflection) is hard to come by any other way. I was thinking more in terms of a contester making the choice between, say, 16 dBi from a long-boom yagi versus the sam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00237.html (9,389 bytes)

105. [Towertalk] 100M-long boom Yagi for 20M -- correction (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:20:19 -0500
I understand the point you're making -- the old water balloon analogy -- some fussy detail about the conservation of energy...hi But doesn't it come out of higher-angle secondary forward lobes? That
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00245.html (9,345 bytes)

106. [Towertalk] Unsolicited testimonials -- MultiNEC and 4NEC2 (version 5) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:59:15 -0500
I have just downloaded the latest versions of these two programs, and am very impressed. MultiNEC 2 does all the good things that the earlier versions did, plus an absolutely spectacular interface wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00281.html (8,105 bytes)

107. [Towertalk] Automatic Rotor Control Question (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu Jan 23 16:52:22 2003
I think that's right. How about EA4TX's interface? See www.ea4tx.com. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database has just been updated. Are you current? www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00386.html (7,917 bytes)

108. [Towertalk] Efficiency of antennas (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu Jan 23 17:46:06 2003
I've seen some fairly interesting claims recently for the efficiency of yagis with coil loading. I'm not quite sure what efficiency means in this context -- is it simply the percentage of the driving
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00388.html (6,978 bytes)

109. [TowerTalk] static drainage (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon Jan 27 07:59:37 2003
I am about to replace the Heathkit antenna switch I've used for the last 5 years with a TopTen 6-way relay box, to give me more options. My question is -- is it worthwhile to install 1.5 megohm resis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00447.html (7,943 bytes)

110. [TowerTalk] static drainage (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon Jan 27 11:06:59 2003
On the other hand, I have consciously opted for the "disconnect everything" method of lightning protection. Given that, couldn't I simply shunt an RF choke to ground inside the relay box at its outpu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00455.html (8,761 bytes)

111. [TowerTalk] static drainage (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon Jan 27 13:02:44 2003
If budget were no object, then I'd probably do as you say, Jon. The point of asking the question about the safety RF choke was static drainage, not strike protection. I am fairly well convinced that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00461.html (9,124 bytes)

112. [TowerTalk] Re: static drainage (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon Jan 27 14:06:46 2003
Hi Jozef -- well, I'm feeling dumb. I never looked at the schematic before writing my previous message, but you're quite right. So nothing to worry about. It will be interesting to see what happens a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00463.html (7,350 bytes)

113. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed Jan 29 07:41:07 2003
Oh? You're about to hear something else. The K-factor they use to rate them is VERY protective of the hardware, because it pretends that the whole weight of the antenna is at the turning radius. I ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00524.html (8,233 bytes)

114. [TowerTalk] Prosistel Rotors (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed Jan 29 14:03:07 2003
Well, it sure isn't all the way out at the full radius. K-factor uses the turning radius, which for HF antennas tends to be the circle described by the tip of the longest element. That badly overstat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00541.html (9,217 bytes)

115. [TowerTalk] Re: Ground rod material (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed Jan 29 14:56:12 2003
I've bought them at Lowe's or Home Depot. As I recall they had both. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database has just been updated. Are you current? www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00543.html (8,216 bytes)

116. [TowerTalk] Re: Ground rod material (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed Jan 29 15:36:08 2003
For whatever it's worth, I recall threads here in past years recounting concern about galvanic corrosion involving copper-plated ground rods and the galvanized coating on Rohn guy wire anchor rods. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00545.html (8,792 bytes)

117. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 02:44:35 -0500
I think this is kind of a bum rap, considering that Steve spends a lot of his time (and some of his money) keeping this list up and running. It's a tremendous resource, and I don't think he's overdon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00042.html (10,742 bytes)

118. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:29:52 -0500
Sorry, I probably short-handed that a bit too much. My models showed the TH-7 with ~18 dB F/B on 20m and nearly 25 dB on 15 and 10, when measured above ground (at 97 feet). Since the TH-7DXX has a 2-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00080.html (10,124 bytes)

119. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:32:01 -0500
With respect, things have changed a lot. Natan, W6XR (force12e@lightlink.com) is the customer service guy now. Going direct to the factory will rarely buy you anything, while Natan gets things done,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00081.html (9,041 bytes)

120. [Towertalk] RE: Yaesu G1000SDX (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:37:04 -0500
I have seen this behavior when the Cinch plugs in my Yaesu rotator control lines were flakey -- fixed them with an application of Caig R5. The notion that lightning fixed a control box full of semico
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00082.html (8,793 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu