Mail Archive Search: <+from:paulc@mediaone.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:paulc@mediaone.net: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 07:37:11 -0500; Tom, This seems like a worthwhile cause and I've been following your correspondence on the PSK31 mail list. Seems like the low-end of 160 between say 1805 to 1807 would work well. Although most PSK31; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00164.html (7,057 bytes)
2. Topband: Titanex Cone Antenna (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 21:07:56 -0500; Does anyone have any experience with either the Titanex LF12 or LF18 Cone Vertical antenna? http://www.titanex.de/verticals.html I've been considering a purchase for use on topband. Thanks. -Paul --; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00076.html (6,742 bytes)
3. Topband: GAP (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 11:45:00 -0500; I have a GAP Voyager and 45-feet is too short, even at my QTH on a Florida Beach. -Paul, W9AC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00191.html (7,287 bytes)
4. TopBand: CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 14:26:13 -0400; characteristics: Nominal Impedance: 75-ohms Velocity Factor: 82% Capacitance per ft.: 16.2 pF This is an RG-59/U Type Rated Cable -Paul, W9AC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Su; /archives//html/Topband/1998-09/msg00177.html (7,733 bytes)
5. TopBand: elevated radials (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 16:20:45 -0500; Has anyone had an opportunity to compare the "K3LR" switched sloping dipole configuration with a quarter-wave vertical using 100+ radials? To me, if one only had a 180-foot support <g>, this would ma; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00193.html (10,593 bytes)
6. TopBand: FT1000mp keyclicks ? (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 17:45:10 -0500; What problems? I've had an FT-1000MP and Ten-Tec Omni Six side-by-side for a few years now, and always thought that the Yaesu's keying is every bit as good as the Omnis. At least mine is that way. Is; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00221.html (7,887 bytes)
7. TopBand: FT1000mp keyclicks ? (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 19:24:24 -0500; I sent my FT-1000MP back to the factory last year to bring it current. The invoice says "PERFORMED SPURS AN CW MODIFICATIONS, COMPLETE TEST AND ALIGNED TO FACTORY SPECIFICATIONS." Anyone know if this; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00223.html (6,990 bytes)
8. TopBand: FT1000 key clicks (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:42:02 -0500; Art: Are you referring to the FT-1000(D) series? I believe the QSK shortcomings have been straightened out with the "MP" model. -Paul, W9AC Club CW N6ND that -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00231.html (8,718 bytes)
9. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 17:15:57 -0500; Excellent point Carl. The discussion and testing should be limited to only the 160M band. Modeling on MW broadcast, 80M or 10 M as someone else suggested last week, may yield completely different re; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00280.html (9,676 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]