Mail Archive Search: <+from:n9en@voyager.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n9en@voyager.net: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ANC-4 noise canceller (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 19:48:18 -0600; Hello TopBanders, I have been bothered with severe power line noise here at my QTH for over a year now and our local electric utility - Commonwealth Edison - basically has told me that their lines ar; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00029.html (8,009 bytes)
2. Topband: NOISE, cont'd. (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:14:17 -0600; Thanks to all who replied concerning the ANC-4 and the two MFJ models. The consensus of opinion seems to be that the MFJ 1025 is much more effective at getting rid of noise problems. Also, thanks to; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00047.html (9,193 bytes)
3. Topband: A.C. LINE FILTER (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 06:03:26 -0600; Hello Ray & All, That's very interesting but in my case, I'm pretty sure that my line noise is being received via my outside antennas. For example on 1.800 MHz. right now, the line noise is at S9 + 1; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00079.html (8,139 bytes)
4. Topband: 5H3RK (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:13:34 -0400; Hello all... No, I hv not worked 5H3RK yet on 160 and sure could use that one for a "new one" on Top Band. I pretty much had the "wind taken out of my sails" after having tried to work the ET3 but wa; /archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00041.html (7,847 bytes)
5. Topband: Fw: 160 (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 06:16:21 -0500; Hello all; I have yet to hear the ET3 any better than ESP copy here at Radio Free Roscoe (IL). I have a "temporary" 300' long Beverage that is oriented towards ET-land. My xmit/rcv antenna is a delta; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00030.html (11,899 bytes)
6. Topband: VK9ML (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:03:31 +0100; Hello Topbanders! I have yet to even HEAR VK9ML on 160 meters at my QTH. I put up a temporary 300' long Beverage that is pointed at roughly 273 degrees (the beam heading for VK9/M from my QTH) in an; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00043.html (7,343 bytes)
7. Topband: Kudos to VK9ML Topband Efforts (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:09:56 +0100; May I add a big "AMEN!" to Barry's posting about the efforts of the VK9ML group on Topband? When the group first was QRV on 160 meters, I would listen every morning before my sunrise. I had put up a; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00062.html (8,372 bytes)
8. Topband: XR0X on 160 (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 06:07:17 -0600; For the past few mornings, I have been trying in vain to hear XR0X well enough on 160 meters to work them. This morning at around 1100Z, I could copy some of the calls & the reports of the ststions t; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00184.html (8,428 bytes)
9. Topband: Re: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 19:35:43 -0600; Hello Topbanders; It's funny (well, not really) that Rob mentions using an ultrasonic receiver and a plastic dish-type antenna for finding power line problems. I don't know what ComEd (our local elec; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00203.html (15,291 bytes)
10. Topband: 160 Meter Transceiver? (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 06:42:30 -0600; Hello all Topbanders; Some time ago, I heard from someone, and I don't remember from whom, that the Kenwood TS-930S had the "hot" receiver for DX'ing on 160 meters. Has anyone else heard that or was; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00134.html (7,674 bytes)
11. Topband: Beverage above fenceline? (score: 1): Author: n9en@voyager.net (N9EN@VOYAGER.NET); Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 07:04:20 -0600; Hello Topbanders! I live in a suburban-type subdivision and have a lot that has "working dimensions" of about 300' x 300' (91m x 91m). Directly behind me is a county forest preserve. A couple of year; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00144.html (7,916 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]