Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dj7ww@t-online.de: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: VE1ZZ has passed on - Very Very Sad news! (Long) (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:58:27 +0200
I am very sorry to read that Jack passed away, thats a very sad news. I will never forget, when I operated CQ160 SSB in 2013 it was 20:30 local time when he called in, I could not believe his S7 sign
/archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00141.html (18,545 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: 160: Digital only DXCC needed - AKA, things that will kill the hobby.................. (score: 1)
Author: "dj7ww@t-online.de" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 22:03:34 +0200 (CEST)
Now its getting really silly OK - I think I've got a good start on the list......................who knew Joe Taylor was the Antichrist?? Things that will kill the hobby.....................in no par
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00186.html (10,759 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: FT-8 Contest would be great for Topband (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:18:44 +0100
No wonder, imagine how many robots are active on all bands in parallel per station. 1.5 million hits for FT8? WOW! _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00117.html (8,738 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: FT-8 Contest would be great for Topband. (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 00:39:16 +0100
1) you need a modern(relatively new)station 6) you like to be bored by doing ham radio 73 Peter The FT8 comet is back: 1) It's still legal; 2) It's still not mandatory to use it; 3) It only 'wastes'
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00131.html (7,397 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 21:05:52 +0100
If my 160m receive would be as bad as with any web sdr I would not contest on that band. Which web sdr is used from Eastern Europe? 73 Peter Serious problems for topband are the use of WEB.SDR. Espec
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00166.html (8,865 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 22:39:43 +0100
Of course I understand the topic. Web sdrs have the worse receiving capabilities. I see no reason at all to use one. But you did not answer my question concerning the sdrs. Please do, if possible wit
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00169.html (10,271 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 23:07:22 +0100
Those are exactly those deaf sdrs I mentioned, just useless. But tell me how exactly will you know who is using them? 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces+dj7ww=t-onlin
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00173.html (12,433 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: T-loaded vertical (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:04:18 +0100
Hi Frank, I just simulated a T vertical 50m away from my 38m high 3L 40m yagi with EZNEC. Pattern and gain did not change on the yagi when it beamed 90° away from the yagi. Only when I turned the yag
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00168.html (10,034 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: AA0RS result CQ160 SSB (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:29:20 +0100
https://www.3830scores.com/showrumor.php?arg=9EaHzxmiiygg1 Hi Unique result : Total: QSOs = 530 State/Prov = 7 Countries = 16 Total Score = 87,969 http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2020
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00228.html (8,112 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: T Top Verticals and yagis (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:35:07 +0100
If a 40m yagi points towards an 80m or 160m dipole in its neighbourhood the yagi pattern will be ruined as well. 73 Peter Hi Paul, A little modelling will answer the question more completely and accu
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00263.html (14,338 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: Phasing lines (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:39:21 +0100
I have used LDF4-50 and LDF 4-75 by RFS for phasing lines on HF bands. They did as expected with 88%, however on VHF/UHF I would measure how they behave. 73 Peter Hi all, I wonder whether anyone has
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00036.html (7,923 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Phasing lines (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:32:40 +0100
LCF 4-50 is relatively cheap here, I pay 2.80 Euro per meter for LDF4-50 and 4,84 Euro/m for LCF78-50. It can be buried and is resistant again mice and bird bites, no chance to be drown and it is ver
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00040.html (8,385 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: NVIS Antenna (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:25:37 +0100
There is nothing special, a 50 feet high dipole has at 25° elevation angle the same gain as a shortened vertical over lossy ground or with just a few radials. 73 Peter Well I've said it dozens of tim
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00194.html (9,653 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: CQ...CQ...CQ (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:57:41 +0100
I think most skimmers on the RBN are wide band skimmers on small antennas. As web sdr receivers they only hear the stronger signals. 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounce
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00237.html (11,699 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 22:36:32 +0100
I think there will be much more not discussed yet concerning ground conductivity. What do you have to offer? Peter, DJ7WW I think it's about time for this discussion about ground conductivity to come
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00334.html (16,224 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: Rotator Potentiometer shunt fed twr (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:39:27 +0200
Bypass the rotor with thick ground lead from the rotating pipe mast to the tower, use ceramic bypass capacitors on the pot contacts and MOVs or low voltage spark gaps to ground on all lines to the ro
/archives//html/Topband/2020-08/msg00047.html (7,624 bytes)

57. Re: Topband: Rotator Potentiometer shunt fed twr (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 01:39:45 +0200
MOVs and shielded rotator cables are also recommended in the ARRL antenna book 20th edition and I use them for that purpose for decades. Andrees rotator cable canīt be laced to the tower as it is a t
/archives//html/Topband/2020-08/msg00058.html (10,116 bytes)

58. Re: Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:40:00 +0200
At my place the two beverages I am using, 160m to NW, 120m to NE are only good for decent signals. The real weak ones I can only copy with my vertical which is an elevated GP (top loaded tower) fed a
/archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00050.html (8,084 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year (score: 1)
Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 15:38:41 +0100
Itīs amazing, the probably envious stations always suspect others with their better antennas and perhaps better operation to use web sdr. 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-b
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00005.html (10,167 bytes)

60. Topband: WG: AW: Low Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "dj7ww@t-online.de" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:06:14 +0100 (CET)
I used a dipole at 103ft and an elevated GP (top loaded tower) fed at 70ft with full size resonance and two elevated straight radials for the last couple of years. Foreground is sloping towards North
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00178.html (9,782 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu