Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+confusion\s+about\s+563\s+vs\s+564\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+confusion\s+about\s+563\s+vs\s+564\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: ron@plet.net (Ron Pletter); Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:45:54 -0400; I have been off this reflector for more than a year and recently resubscribed. At one time I owned an Omni VI model 563. I presently own an Omni VI Plus model 564. But I am finding folks posting to t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00222.html (7,967 bytes)
2. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: wb9iog@revealed.net (MIKE SOUHRADA); Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 20:32:44 -0500; a model 563 with Option 3 upgrade now called Omni-VI Ron as I'm saving my shekels for the Omni VI+. I've noticed the mis use of the "factory upgrade" vs VI+ on frequent listings. Sometimes it's not e; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00227.html (8,539 bytes)
3. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: Ernie Stedman" <ernie@n2ojq.com (Ernie Stedman); Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 21:54:03 -0400; I was told by the factory there is no difference between a 563 with Option 3 and a 564, so I don't believe it is misleading at all to call a 563 with Option 3 a VI Plus, but I'm just going on what th; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00229.html (10,098 bytes)
4. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 22:22:18 EDT; At present I own two of one and one of the other. Being curious I gave them a fairly close twice over. The only difference I can find is the decal on the front panel. So if I were in the market for a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00230.html (9,002 bytes)
5. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:40:13 -0500; Does an Omni 563 upgraded to Option 3 say "OMNI VI PLUS" on the front panel? The 564 does. 73 Bob K4TAX 3 upgraded; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00234.html (11,373 bytes)
6. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:48:23 -0400; I haven't checked this out but someone told me the real Omni VI+ had circuit boards with surface mount technology, smt, components while the other did not. Perhaps someone can verify this. I can't he; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00235.html (9,839 bytes)
7. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: csturner@slonet.org (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 21:55:42 -0700; Yes, isn't the CW transmit offset set differently (different crystals in the BFO) in the "real" 6+ ? I also understand that the product detector circuit in the 6 was improved at some point (second or; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00238.html (9,235 bytes)
8. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: Ernie Stedman" <ernie@n2ojq.com (Ernie Stedman); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:41:55 -0400; Hi Bob. Good point, the 563 with option 3 does not say PLUS on the front panel, so I guess the silkscreen is the difference. N2OJQ Ernie Stedman 130 Buckthorn Court Roswell GA 30076 Sign up for PAYPA; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00240.html (13,087 bytes)
9. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: k4sqr@juno.com (Jim Miller); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:33:47 -0400; Ron; The term has become v-e-r-y misused for the Option upgrade models. They are still a 563 with factory ___ upgrades. And a Paragon is just that; not a Paragon 1 while we are on the same topic! :-); /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00241.html (10,108 bytes)
10. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: k4sqr@juno.com (Jim Miller); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 06:42:09 -0400; Do you feel it is ethical for someone to advertise a 563 with upgrades as "Omni VI+" when they try to sell it? This is exactly what some hams are doing, whether intentional or not. It is still a Mode; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00242.html (11,847 bytes)
11. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:13:51 -0400; Yes, but the crystals are the same only the alternate sideband crystal is used. This results in less of a required frequency shift in the CW transmit offset. I had modified my Omni Six this way befo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00243.html (8,991 bytes)
12. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:04:22 -0400; As long as it is in some way listed as "Omni Six Plus - Factory Option 3 Upgraded." -Paul, W9AC; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00244.html (8,893 bytes)
13. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: n2wf@comcast.net (Bill Nicolson); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:13:49 -0400; I thought that the 6 plus (564) had a TXCO and the older (563) had a crystal oven. Did Ten Tec make that change with the option 3 upgrade? 73 de Bill N2WF Bill Nicolson - N2WF - K2 #1764 Colonia - Ne; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00245.html (8,603 bytes)
14. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: k4sqr@juno.com (Jim Miller); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:15:27 -0400; No, that was not the question Paul; "Omni VI + FS" have been listed both here and other Swap groups; it takes a direct e-mail to learn it was a 563 with factory upgrades to ??. This is misleading and; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00246.html (8,964 bytes)
15. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A Calvin); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:46:50 -0500; For my 2 cents - the difference between a 563 and a 564 (VI and VI+) is not only some construction practices, and possible circuit improvements, but more importantely it gives a rough indication of t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00250.html (9,398 bytes)
16. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: ke4teg@bellsouth.net (KE4TEG); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:47:38 -0400; The term is being used loosely in my opinion. There was enough of a difference for Ten-Tec to feel the need to roll the part number on the radio from 563 to 564. Electrically they are just about the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00251.html (10,297 bytes)
17. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:39:51 -0500; Jim: Yes I do. A 653 with upgrade is a ONMI VI with opt 3 and a 654 is a OMNI VI+. I think in dealing and advertising, these points should be clearly stated. Same basically is true with the Paragon s; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00261.html (13,068 bytes)
18. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:31:08 -0500; Jim: Sorry, I mis read your initial post and thus answered incorrectly. Let me re-state my text and my belief as to such. A 653 with upgrade is a ONMI VI with opt 3 and should be advertised as such.; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00262.html (15,776 bytes)
19. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: Ernie Stedman" <ernie@n2ojq.com (Ernie Stedman); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:07:52 -0400; Funny, when Ten-Tec was offering Option 1, 2 & 3, Option 3 was clearly advertised and sold as a "Complete Factory Upgrade to Omni VII Plus". N2OJQ Ernie Stedman 130 Buckthorn Court Roswell GA 30076 S; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00264.html (8,407 bytes)
20. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 05:24:29 -0700 (PDT); K4TAX stated: "There is a difference technically, in appearance, age, and performance." What is the difference in performance between a well maintained 563 opt 3 and a 564, assuming they both have al; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00265.html (8,308 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]