Mail Archive Search: <+from:tuner@zoominternet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:tuner@zoominternet.net: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI Filter bandpass frequency (score: 1): Author: "Keith Hamilton" <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:19:19 -0400; I am a new owner of an OMNI VI Option 3. In the 6.3mHz Passband IF I have installed a #288 1.8hz filter a #285 500hz filter and a #282 250hz filter. When I tune to a CW signal I tune to the tonal fre; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00018.html (7,739 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: "Keith Hamilton" <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:28:51 -0400; I made a typo in my question. I meant to say I must tune the radio from 7.040.00 to 7.040.20 to center the 250 hz filter. Sorry Keith W8GX _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00019.html (7,296 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:51:00 -0400; I am a piano tuner by profession. My tonal impression could never be as much as 200hertz off. The filter is 200 hz off. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00021.html (8,977 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:56:07 -0400; If I switch from the 500 hz filter to the 250 hz filter the tone heard in the speaker does NOT change. Just the signal strength changes. To bring the signal strength back up I must tune up the band.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00022.html (7,579 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Passband (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 19:20:03 -0400; I hear the default 700 Hz tone thru the 500hz filter with the band pass control centered. When I switch to the 250 Hz filter the tone remains 700 Hz The signal strength goes to almost 0. To bring the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00024.html (9,673 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:40:04 -0400; Thank you for your input and expertise Gary but I still don't see how the PBT setting would be correct for one filter (500 hz filter - PBT control at either 11 or 1 o'clock depending on the band) and; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00028.html (13,144 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:52:58 -0400; Actually I am trying to reconcile the differences between the center frequency of the 500 Hz filter and the 250 Hz filter, both in the 6.3 mHz PB IF. The center frequencies should be the same -( 6.29; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00029.html (12,525 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 01:14:47 -0400; Actually I wondered that myself Geoff. The filter is stamped "282" and "48054" on the top of the crystals. Keith W8GX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00031.html (10,296 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:18:42 -0400; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00035.html (16,700 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Filter bandpass frequency (score: 1): Author: "Keith Hamilton" <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:05:22 -0400; Well I hardly believe it and I certainly do not understand it. As suggested, I moved my PBT control to about the 11 o'clock position. The 6.3 mhz cw filters (500 and 250) now track. In the 11:30 posi; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00036.html (9,859 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Correction (score: 1): Author: "Keith Hamilton" <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:09:48 -0400; Gary - You were right! Turning the PBT to 11 o'clock solved it. Keith W8GX Or you could just re-read closely the Ten-Tec owner's manual and note the recommendation to move the PBT to either 11 or 1 o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00037.html (12,555 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Filter information (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:28:55 -0400; Keith W8GX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00066.html (10,375 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Filter Data (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:28:50 -0400; The "stock" 9mhz filter is 2400 hz, 8 pole and is numbered 48058. (at least in my radio) The 288 filter is 8 pole. Keith W8GX Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00068.html (9,568 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Filter Data (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:31:51 -0400; 48074 is 8 pole Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00069.html (9,036 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] ten tec 705 mic info (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:34:55 -0400; I purchased a replacement from Ten-Tec. Keith W8GX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00084.html (8,714 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:43:47 -0400; Wow! That's just what I was going to say! Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/te; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00036.html (11,613 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Last Ten-Tec to NOT use Microprocessor? (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:52:39 -0400; That's the radio for me! Someday I hope to find a nice one in good condition. I was thinking of going in on the board purchase just in case I find a nice one without a working display. Sent from my i; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00085.html (9,431 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] hamfest (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:32:44 -0400; and what was that surprise? The Eagle? Keith N8CEP _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00363.html (7,176 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] The Corsair II Display Logic PCBs (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:52:43 -0400; Thank you sooo much! Keith N8CEP Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00376.html (9,319 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Omni 3 (was new RX366 sub receiver) (score: 1): Author: Keith Hamilton <tuner@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:23:25 -0400; oh really??? Keith N8CEP _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00457.html (12,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]