Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kh7t@arrl.net: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: K2/ORION/746PRO (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Sun Aug 3 18:15:49 2003
John, Thank you for your comment. I was using the OMNI VI(option 3) and a/b tested it significantly with the K2. For the record the OMNI was better than my prior radios. I have carefully evaluated th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00051.html (9,583 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Mon Aug 11 16:58:41 2003
Hi Mark, Glad to see that you got an Orion and are putting it through it's paces. Mine came in the first round and I have noted many of the same things you have encountered. I assume you are using th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00193.html (10,423 bytes)

3. [TenTec] WTB:Manual for Triton IV (544) (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Tue Feb 25 20:53:45 2003
Want to obtain a manual for the Tentec 544 (Triton IV Digital) Aloha, John KH7T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00940.html (6,426 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Re: WTB:Manual for Triton IV (544) Manual found. (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Wed Feb 26 16:03:23 2003
I have an original manual on the way. Thanks to all who responded to my request. I had several responses within a few minutes of my posting. Wow! Mahalo, John KH7T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00973.html (6,794 bytes)

5. [TenTec] I get nervous when . . (antenna terminal termination) (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 11:02:37 -1000
This silliness about evaluating a receiver with an unterminated (infinite impedance) input has gone far enough. Why do I care about garbage that may be picked up with an unterminated front end on a t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00251.html (7,016 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus alignment without a freq ctr? (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:24:06 -1000
I found that on my OMNI VI + mod 3, I was easily able to hear a beat note between the TCXO and the carrier of 10 MHz WWV. I used Spectrogram to sort things out and make sure that I was beating to the
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00564.html (8,169 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Re: TenTec digest, Vol 1 #729 - 11 msgs (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:44:28 -1000
Jim, OUCH! True but nasty. George will now have to try to recover. Watch out. I think an interesting alternative approach is a Tayloe quadrature mixer direct to the A/D and DSP. It seems to have exce
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00610.html (7,948 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Re: TenTec digest, Vol 1 #658 - 5 msgs (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 13:13:24 -1000
Mark, I am driving from London to Sevierville either Thursday or Early Friday.. However, I will not be returning to London. I am planning to return only to Cincinnati on Monday. I was going to sight
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00408.html (6,566 bytes)

9. [TenTec] FS (TenTec) OMNI VI + option 3 with 301 remote knob (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:34:20 -1000
For Sale: OMNI VI plus (Model 563 with Factory Upgrade Option 3) Includes two optional filters: model 285, 500 Hz model IRC 751, 250 Hz Includes TenTec 301 remote tuning Knob and Computer cable with
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00008.html (7,103 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Re: Tuners (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 09:54:33 -1000
The reason that many of the "other" radios have built in tuners is so that the bipolar amplifiers could be made ot work into a reasonable 3 to 1 SWR range without folding back power. Many of these ea
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00396.html (7,760 bytes)

11. [TenTec] re:Tuners (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 19:24:25 -1000
I think Carl's statement about fold back vs bias reduction is a better explanation than mine. In any case, the TenTec method for the OMNI VI preserves the finals and does not cause distortion like so
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00439.html (6,364 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Spurious 147.495 MHz signal from RX320 (score: 1)
Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:53:46 -1000
When I tuned the RX320 to 10 meters 26.580MHz (the frequency the P5 was operating on) I noticed a strong signal on 147.15 repeater frequency. The signal in my jpole up 70 ft was strong enough to inte
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00044.html (7,488 bytes)

13. [TenTec] WTB: 10 meter to 2 meter Transverter TT-1210 (score: 1)
Author: KH7T@arrl.net (John Buck)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:20:47 -1000
I am interested in finding a used Ten-Tec 2 meter to 20 meter transverter. If you have one you do not need, let me know the condition and price. Aloha, John KH7T
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00148.html (6,344 bytes)

14. [TenTec] RE: Studio 1 Mic Paint Job!! (score: 1)
Author: John Buck <kh7t@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:39:32 -1000
I was told by TenTec to contact Heil when I had this problem last year. My original microphone purchased with my Orion, was replaced by Heil in November 2003 because of the same paint problem. Now th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00524.html (8,529 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Re {TenTec}Orion roofing filters. (score: 1)
Author: John Buck <kh7t@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:18:05 -1000
Lets not forget that if the strong signal is on one side you can sneak up on him using pass band tuning and the very sharp skirt of the 1 kHz. filter combined with the DSP filter with the optimal ban
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00143.html (7,279 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] 2054 HeadPhone muting and Speech processing notes. (score: 1)
Author: John Buck <kh7t@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:08:06 -1000
With my Orion 2.054 upgrade, the headphone audio can be reliably killed by the following procedure. Place the sub receiver in AM mode. Make sure T and R are on the main vfo, any frequency, any mode.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00840.html (9,902 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Orion (original) S-meter (score: 1)
Author: John Buck <kh7t@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:14:00 -1000
I guess I do not know what the problem is. Most of the data shown so far do not say if Sub is connected to the ANT or not. My data is consistent with expectations and I also get similar data using bo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00847.html (8,339 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 or IC-7800 ? (Randy K7RAN) (score: 1)
Author: John Buck <kh7t@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:18:23 -1000
If price were no object, I would buy both, put an equal amount into the antenna system and hire someone to maintain the property so I could spend all my time experimenting and on the air. If I merely
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00761.html (8,328 bytes)

19. [TenTec] Orion II 2.033 AM Transmit Output (score: 1)
Author: John Buck <kh7t@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 12:50:27 -1000
Put me in the I love my Orion camp because it has the best receiver I can get. I never thought I would get sucked into the AM discussion. But I hooked up the dummy load, 2 different power meters in s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00040.html (10,104 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Orion V1 - Orion V2 NR Comparison (score: 1)
Author: John Buck <kh7t@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:51:18 -1000
Thank you Grant for the excellent table comparing the NR performance in the V1.37x and v2 firmware. I was in the process of deciding which version of 1.37x to return to. I do not have the luxury of a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00351.html (7,786 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu