- 1. FW: [SPAM] Re: RE: [SECC] Alabama QSO Party summary W4NTI (score: 1)
- Author: GMacie at innotrac.com (Macie, Gordon)
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:08:51 -0500
- ???????? I'm not spam.... really .... --Original Message-- From: automated-response@earthlink.net [mailto:automated-response@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:04 AM To: Macie, Gordon
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-10/msg00003.html (9,024 bytes)
- 2. FW: [SPAM] Re: RE: [SECC] Alabama QSO Party summary W4NTI (score: 1)
- Author: oloryn at benshome.net (Ben Coleman)
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:18:33 -0500
- Earthlink provides an optional whitelisting feature in its spam blocking service. For those using it, only email from addresses in a users online address book is allowed through. Other mail gets a re
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-10/msg00006.html (7,372 bytes)
- 3. FW: [SPAM] Re: RE: [SECC] Alabama QSO Party summary W4NTI (score: 1)
- Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 18:32:30 -0500
- I just installed it here also. So if any of ya get a nasty spam message, ignore. Because I check my suspected spam daily and add those from SECC. And anyone else that got trapped. Sure does clean out
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-10/msg00008.html (8,223 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu