Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SECC\s+\#2\s+to\s+run\s+away\s+with\s+SECC\s+honors\s+in\s+NAQP\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SECC\s+\#2\s+to\s+run\s+away\s+with\s+SECC\s+honors\s+in\s+NAQP\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] SECC #2 to run away with SECC honors in NAQP? (score: 1): Author: dbmcalpine at earthlink.net (Dennis McAlpine); Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:33:35 -0500; I dunno how these teams got set up but there are several possibilities. Team #2 could be FOC members +2 but there are several other FOCers on other teams so guess that is not the reason. I guess it c; /archives//html/SECC/2010-01/msg00029.html (8,089 bytes)
2. [SECC] SECC #2 to run away with SECC honors in NAQP? (score: 1): Author: paul at nn4f.com (paul at nn4f.com); Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:48:32 +0000 (GMT); Dennis, I do believe you could be right, but I have to disagree on the SC mult, Dorchester County is rarer so worth more,:) especially as I'm there, if only:)) GL Paul On January 8, 2010 at 9:33 PM D; /archives//html/SECC/2010-01/msg00031.html (8,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]