SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] SECC #2 to run away with SECC honors in NAQP?

Subject: [SECC] SECC #2 to run away with SECC honors in NAQP?
From: paul at nn4f.com (paul at nn4f.com)
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:48:32 +0000 (GMT)
Dennis,


I do believe you could be right, but I have to disagree on the SC mult,
Dorchester County
is rarer so worth more,:) especially as I'm there, if only:)) GL


Paul
On January 8, 2010 at 9:33 PM Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine at earthlink.net> 
wrote:

>? 
> 
>? I dunno how these teams got set up but there are several possibilities.
> Team #2 could be FOC members +2 but there are several other FOCers on other
> teams so guess that is not the reason.? I guess it could be SC + 3 outsiders
> but there are other SCers on other teams so guess that wasn't it either.
> Probably it was from previous scores and I must have been over my head last
> time or else you other guys didn't get on vy much.? Clearly, the big guns
> are on Team #1 but I think Team #2 could be a surprise (I'm counting on
> K4BAI and NN4F to bring the surprises) so I will predict Team #2 As the SECC
> winner.? But, then I was a Red Sox fan too.
> 
> Don't forget SC is a rare mult so if you don't get me on the first or second
> call just wait in the pile (boy, is that being optimistic) so you be assured
> of getting that rare SC mult.? So what if there are other SC stations listed
> as being on, you can never be sure if they will be there.? And, even if they
> are on, they are not in Georgetown County which is worth more points than
> the rest of SC.? And, if you believe all that, I have a bridge back north I
> can sell you.
> 
> GL y'all, 73,
> 
> Dennis, K2SX
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20100108/1d3c0161/attachment.html
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>