Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Rtty\s+DXCC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Rtty\s+DXCC\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Rtty DXCC (score: 1): Author: va3dx at sympatico.ca (va3dx@sympatico.ca); Date: Sat Feb 1 06:24:13 2003; Just got my certicate, # 1198 Sept 25,2002 First RTTY qso was with S2/HA5BUS in 1992 Ten and a half years later, 306 wrk'd, 301 confirmed, S9MX arrived yesterday.... Glenn VA3DX; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00004.html (6,138 bytes)
2. [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: bgkurz@epix.net (Kurzenknabe, Barbara and Glenn); Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 20:12:15 -0500; Hi Guys, How about RTTY DXCC #8 dated Sept. 2, 1977.... Those countries were worked with a "real" TTY machine.... Model 15 built from several junkers obtained through the Air Force MARS program. Firs; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00074.html (6,570 bytes)
3. [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Anthony W. DePrato" <wa4jqs@mikrotec.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:15:41 -0500; Well after 45 years of rttying i sent my cards in for DXCC got it in the mail today cert # 1402.. only cost me $170.18 to get my cards into the system but did end up with mixed phone cw and rtty. 40,; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00155.html (6,981 bytes)
4. [RTTY] rtty dxcc (score: 1): Author: "Anthony W. DePrato" <wa4jqs@mikrotec.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:11:30 -0500; well ill have to get all the numbers together but i have 133 confirmed via LOTW. will have to dig out the paper work from arrl but think there is another 120 or so there. will send Jim the numbers wh; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-03/msg00166.html (7,010 bytes)
5. [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 18:08:40 +0100; Hi all, I do tend to agree with Bill W6WRT, in that the ARRL is losing a potential revenue stream from other data awards, BUT, where do you start and finish? I can see the relevance of a PSK DXCC cer; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00085.html (8,666 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <abrohamneal@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:18:08 -0400; When I was in business I always had great ideas that would generate revenue but lose money horribly. We do not know the overhead of running a certificate program, nor the additional cost of running o; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00086.html (10,756 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:40:55 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I would suggest the ARRL redo the certificate with two new lines as in the following example: BANDS: 40, 15, 10 MODES: PSK31, PSK63, RTTY In other words, just list which band; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00087.html (8,075 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:48:22 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I think the only cost would be hiring a programmer to create a program which will sort through the database to pick out the desired bands and modes which were requested. The; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00088.html (7,948 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <abrohamneal@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:54:12 -0400; Thats just the cost of storing the data. Someone has to oversee the program, QC the certificates, mail them, accept credits from non-LoTW submissions, validate specific mode qualifications of DXpedit; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00089.html (8,816 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:20:02 -0400; It's also the cost of maintaining an additional set of records, annual listings, developing and maintaining an "Honor Roll" for each sub-mode, etc. Unlike WAS, DXCC is not "just" the initial 100 ent; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00090.html (10,426 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:48:18 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: All those things are done anyway, aren't they? As I see it, here's how it would work at the ARRL: A DXCC request would come in. It would specify which bands and modes the sen; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00091.html (9,310 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:49:14 -0700; I tell you what as the last Awards Manager for the RTTY Digital Journal I believe I have some wallpaper left in the filing cabinet. I can make one up that would say nearly what ever you might like. F; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00092.html (7,804 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:51:49 -0700; Database doesn't track mode. All are lumped as RTTY. Not only that, the early cards in the Don Search era don't have mode or band or anything. Easier with LOTW, but the fields of mode are not there.; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00093.html (9,021 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:03:12 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Agreed that the older cards may or may not have the correct mode information. We would have to go with whatever is there. We are already tracking 330+ countries and endless p; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00094.html (8,769 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <abrohamneal@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:06:41 -0400; Having done a bit of ham volunteering, I can imagine that the awards duty is one you cannot keep for a really long time (I really admire the guys like you and K4GMH that do/have done it). People get; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00095.html (11,051 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: Gedking@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:06:52 -0400 (EDT); I think we have beaten this subject to death In a message dated 8/4/2011 1:48:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dezrat1242@yahoo.com writes: ORIGINAL MESSAGE: more, REPLY: I think the only cost would be; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00097.html (8,672 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 05:25:08 -0400; My friend WS7I wrote: "Now we have no magazine, we have no awards, and we don't have a RTTY gathering in Dayton either." And until someone, not those that have "been there, done that", steps forward; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00105.html (8,110 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]