Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Implications\s+of\s+remote\s+control\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:14:00 -0800
I can see the day coming when a person will no longer need a "station" in the usual sense. With internet control, he can simply operate a station of his choosing - anywhere in the world. Imagine a fe
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00123.html (8,146 bytes)

2. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: mobile.workshop@guernseytelecoms.com (Mobile Workshop)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:33:49 -0000
Hi Bill and the group, Well, the technology certainly exists for what you describe right now, but the question I have to ask is WHY? It won't take much extra for it to be done totally automatically,
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00124.html (10,756 bytes)

3. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:48:44 -0800
<snip> _________________________________________________________ Thanks for your response, Phil. I can see two major reasons why: 1. Cost. One will no longer have to have his own equipment. No transc
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00126.html (9,693 bytes)

4. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: dhill@cprk.com (Hill, Don)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:01:17 -0600
Bill & others who are subscribed to the WriteLog reflector know that I am doing remote control RTTY over the Internet already. I think this is a pretty neat concept and I made my first ever remote co
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00127.html (11,630 bytes)

5. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:12:44 -0500
Yuck!
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00128.html (7,810 bytes)

6. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:14:00 -0500
We already do - It's called - REFLECTORS! ;-))
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00129.html (8,383 bytes)

7. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: etienne.rosseel@pandora.be (ON7UI/Etienne)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:34:31 +0100
And the pile-up for the rare dx will be on the remote network. Due to great demand they will have to invest in more network resources which will reflect in a larger fee. No more fidling with homemad
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00130.html (9,300 bytes)

8. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:32:34 -0500
Don Hill wrote: "Will it work for DX'ing?" Not for me it won't! Explaing the challenge, regardless of the legality, of "remoting" in a South Korean station to work P5? All awards will lose their sign
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00131.html (8,549 bytes)

9. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:30:00 +0000
Can you imagine a station here in Oregon with a radio and tower in G land, another in ZS, one in JA, one in ZL all accessible via the internet. Man, what would the rules be for that :-) 73 Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00132.html (8,313 bytes)

10. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:32:35 +0000
But that is essentially going on now. A "hired gun" blows into town, operates a mega-station and leaves for home. Called "guest op." Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00133.html (8,886 bytes)

11. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: deuxfox@earthlink.net (deuxfox)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:40:09 +0000
We never know where technology is going to lead us. It is productive and stimulating to brainstorm around what we suspect and/or expect the future will be. That said I have at present one thought tha
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00135.html (8,283 bytes)

12. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: wx4tm@mindspring.com (Tom Moore)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:38:48 -0600
Single Op All Band.. What else?? .. every thing else seems to be.. Tom/WX4TM
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00138.html (8,465 bytes)

13. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: w1vxv@adelphia.net (Bob Boyd)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:38:39 -0500
And DOUBLE-YUCK from me. I, too, want to assemble and tinker with and be responsible for my own station. I was taught that was what ham radio was all about! And that is where the most enjoyment has c
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00140.html (8,654 bytes)

14. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: w1mag@bellatlantic.net (Ed Magnuson)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:46:46 -0500
And then we could all get rid of our ham gear, post our internet addresses on a Web site, and just e-mail other! Wow. Easy contacts. What fun. Ed, W1MAG
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00141.html (7,966 bytes)

15. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: dhill@cprk.com (Hill, Don)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:51:46 -0600
I don't think anyone would really not want to still assemble and have their own station. What's neat is that you can now control that station from anywhere in the world. I can imagine one day sitting
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00142.html (9,849 bytes)

16. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:25:40 -0500
Just curious - What can you do if the rig hangs in transmit? Do you have a special "kill" scenario available via WinVNC?
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00144.html (8,041 bytes)

17. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: ekki@plicht.de (Ekki Plicht)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:34:21 +0100
Well, the technology is surely there already, and it's fascinating and also somewhat scary... But already, most contests do have a rule which would apply here: (quoting from the WPX RTTY Contest 2001
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00147.html (10,075 bytes)

18. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:43:15 -0800
Hmmm, the rigs must be within a 500m diameter circle, but the antennas can be outside? Is this to allow large rhombics (how large is the ZD8Z rhombic, does anyone know?) and Beverages? Actually, it d
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00149.html (9,070 bytes)

19. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: wx4tm@mindspring.com (Tom Moore)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 19:53:18 -0600
we would most likely get an act of congress passed first and that takes at least 4 or 5 years.. and if nato has to concur, its another 3 or 4 yrs.. contests managers/sponsors wud take at least that l
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00150.html (9,235 bytes)

20. [RTTY] Implications of remote control (score: 1)
Author: m-matsubara@pop02.odn.ne.jp (M.Matsubara)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:03:11 +0900
"I made my first ever remote control RTTY contact over the Internet Saturday night using WriteLog & my TS870 on my shack PC and controlling it from a PC with a high-speed Internet connection in the n
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00156.html (8,663 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu