Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+A\s+different\s+approach\s+to\s+an\s+old\s+topic\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+A\s+different\s+approach\s+to\s+an\s+old\s+topic\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] A different approach to an old topic (score: 1): Author: eu1sa@belsonet.net (Vladimir V. Sidorov); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:41:38 +0300; Hi all, For those interested how many RTTY DXCC are issued by now, I've just received mine No.1104. And you know what? I've just looked into the DXCC Yearbook - 2000 and on the 1st page there is a ph; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-09/msg00108.html (7,157 bytes)
2. [RTTY] A different approach to an old topic (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:01:09 -0400; HI Walt, I think it means there are a lot more CW/SSB ops than RTTY ops. active RTTY DXers. As holder of both RTTY DXCC and 5BDXCC (and 5BWAZ), I don't think either RTTY DXCC or 5BDXCC are difficult,; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-09/msg00109.html (8,444 bytes)
3. [RTTY] A different approach to an old topic (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:39:57 -0700 (PDT); -- "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <eu1sa@belsonet.net> asks: I don't think so. It's just that RTTY requires extra equipment above and beyond the microphone that comes in the box with the radio, or the straigh; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-09/msg00110.html (8,019 bytes)
4. [RTTY] A different approach to an old topic (score: 1): Author: wwilson@carr.org (Wayne Wilson); Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 21:24:31 -0700; Hello Walt, I agree with W2UP and others. Nothing really more difficult about it, the extra equipment was usually the reason for lower activity. I got my first DXCC, a mixed one in 1974 and it was #1; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-09/msg00119.html (7,652 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]