Mail Archive Search: <+from:scarroll@mchsi.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:scarroll@mchsi.com: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY WPX K2SC SOAB LP (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J Carroll" <scarroll@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:34:30 -0600; CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest Call: K2SC Operator(s): K2SC Station: K2SC Class: SOAB LP QTH: AL Operating Time (hrs): 28.7 Summary: Band QSOs Pts -- 80: 148 388 40: 129 456 20: 263 517 15: 262 656 10: 42 89; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00267.html (7,350 bytes)
2. [RTTY] "Rookie" Category? (score: 1): Author: scarroll@mchsi.com; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:45:09 +0000; There's no doubt this topic will stir up some controversy from every point of view, but what he heck I'm game. So here goes... I was somewhat disappointed to read the classification for the "Rookie"; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00286.html (7,039 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Great fun BARTG (score: 1): Author: scarroll@mchsi.com; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:19:51 +0000; True, but the rules don't preclude calling CQ BARTG a dozen times in a row before listening for a response either. Brevity it the key to success !!! Most software programs can handle those variation; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00176.html (8,857 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J Carroll" <scarroll@mchsi.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:46:48 -0600; Tom, If it were me, I'd do one of the following... tower, or improving the feedline... a few DB here or there goes a L-O-N-G way and then you wouldn't need an amplifier !!!) filters My 2 cents... 73,; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00290.html (7,206 bytes)
5. [RTTY] VOLTA Scores (score: 1): Author: scarroll@mchsi.com; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:14:03 +0000; Am I the only one who finds it outrageous to have scores in excess of 230 billion (yes, that's a "B") in a contest ??? Just a random observation... 73, Steve - K2SC __________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00107.html (6,241 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] VOLTA Scores (score: 1): Author: Stephen J Carroll <scarroll@mchsi.com>; Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 05:49:35 -0500; Ty, Thank you for the clarification, but even 2 Billion is a pretty BIG number. 73, Steve - K2SC _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00116.html (7,579 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1): Author: scarroll@mchsi.com; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:29:15 +0000; I have to agree with Tom, WX4TM. Nobody's "whining" or asking the BIG GUN (or little pistol) SO2R ops to "...come down to the SO1R level...". If you're a proficient, contest winning RTTY operator (wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00191.html (8,788 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: scarroll@mchsi.com; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:00:43 +0000; Yikes, it's really hard NOT to enter into this discussion. I've been biting my tongue for so long there's nothing left !!! It seems to me that by having an EXPERT Class in a contest that would classi; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00267.html (9,196 bytes)
9. [RTTY] BARTG Exchange? (score: 1): Author: Stephen J Carroll <scarroll@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:56:48 -0500; Well, let's just say I'm "blowing the whistle" on a few individuals (although I won't mention any names/callsigns). During the contest, on more than one occasion, the exchange DID NOT include the RST; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00226.html (7,002 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Exchange? (score: 1): Author: scarroll@mchsi.com; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:16:11 +0000; Hank, He NEVER made it into my log, because I couldn't get the proper contest exchange from him (even when I asked for it). If your suggestion were to really work, he should be removed from everyone'; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00249.html (8,770 bytes)
11. [RTTY] RTTY WPX WF4M (AA4U) SOAB LP (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J Carroll" <scarroll@mchsi.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:14:32 -0600; CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest Call: WF4M Operator(s): AA4U Station: AA4U Class: SOAB LP QTH: AL Operating Time (hrs): 30.0 Summary: Band QSOs Pts -- 80: 165 470 40: 284 964 20: 540 1253 15: 17 42 10: 0 0 --; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00217.html (6,914 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Carroll" <scarroll@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:18:32 -0500; Well, now that you mention it... let me "open up a can of worms". Let me first start by stating this is MY personal observation, and should not be construed as an attack on any one person or an enti; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00195.html (8,606 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]