Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:recordupe@verizon.net: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 148, Issue 5 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 15:38:12 -0400
On 4/5/2015 12:00 PM, rtty-request@contesting.com "In RTTY today: You can't_participate_ in a contest unless..." Well, you can participate, and get a lot out of it; testing you rig and antennas, work
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00018.html (7,130 bytes)

42. Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:49:43 -0400
If the BARTG committee determines that the time portion of the BARTG exchange has become too problematic for its continued use in the contest, may I suggest replacing it with a code that indicates po
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00048.html (7,135 bytes)

43. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:28:40 -0500
1. If runners only want to send a call once, by all means do it at the end where is less likely to be garbled by software that misses the first one or two characters. 2. Like Don, I send the serial n
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00231.html (14,339 bytes)

44. [RTTY] 75 Meter Phone Hogs (Polite Term) (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 20:37:52 -0500
Why should voice modes be in control of 80 percent of the band. Is this smart phone attitude? CB! K2YG To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00292.html (7,970 bytes)

45. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 159, Issue 65 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:56:24 -0400
With the below tongue-in-cheek posting as an ice-breaker, perhaps an answer to a small part of the QRL problem is to start calling CQ when a CQing SO2R occupier is off chasing a multiplier and has no
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00299.html (8,374 bytes)

46. Re: [RTTY] Rigblaster Plus & Windows 10 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 12:51:08 -0400
Windows 10 downloaded (see below) a couple of days ago, and would not operate my K3 (not S) ptt circuit uisng the Elecraft USB/Serial Port adapter with N1MM, MMTTY alone, or wsjtx2. Rather than fight
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-05/msg00078.html (8,198 bytes)

47. [RTTY] RTTY During Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:29:23 -0400
I am preparing two stations to be RTTY capable during field day, one for the New Providence ARC (N2XJ) and one under my call with a few other ops. The club endeavor is motivated primarily to interest
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-06/msg00059.html (6,752 bytes)

48. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY Plaques (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 17:01:22 -0400
Ed Thanks to you and to FlexRadio Systems for the WPX QRP NA plaque. First plaque I've ever received, so it is very much appreciated. 73, Dave, K2YG On 8/12/2016 12:00 PM, rtty-request@contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00044.html (8,124 bytes)

49. Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:38:30 -0400
In almost all RTTY contests I operate qrp, so I am always concerned with taking too much of someone's time to get my exchange copied accurately. I have three particular items for which I am looking f
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00103.html (9,747 bytes)

50. Re: [RTTY] Don't like to work qrp stations (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:43:14 -0400
Oh, let's get a noisy generator and go out into a Nation Park and be obnoxious running 100 watts so you won't be tied (sic) of working QRP stations. You work more of them than you know. Within the co
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00129.html (7,943 bytes)

51. [RTTY] QRP in contests (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:03:03 -0400
Well, I am surprised. It seems that the (at least vocal) majority of the RTTY contesting community has little respect for qrp in a contest, or perhaps it's just for any weak signal. Any contest is a
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00130.html (7,750 bytes)

52. Re: [RTTY] WAE RTTY and QTCs (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:52:43 -0400
I have been doing QTCs in the WAE for several years because it is fun and it raises my score to one I'd never be able to achieve running QRP, as I usually do. I _always_ ask to receive QTCs, never to
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00376.html (8,766 bytes)

53. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 167, Issue 16 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 14:21:43 -0500
Does anyone know the typical error rate for QTCs, as is shown in each individual log report. I had a 6% rate last year. Dave, K2YG On 11/9/2016 12:00 PM, rtty-request@contesting.com wrote: ate: Wed,
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00062.html (7,310 bytes)

54. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 169, Issue 22 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:03:15 -0500
Jim, you might be seeing the RTTY Roundup Log Due Date. 73, Dave, K2YG On 1/25/2017 9:29 AM, rtty-request@contesting.com wrote: Message: 4 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:09:19 -0600 From: "Jim W7RY"<jimw7
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-01/msg00083.html (7,272 bytes)

55. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 169, Issue 29 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:49:52 -0500
Do not some sprints allow multiple contacts after a few others with the same station? I haven't worked the other sprints but I seem to remember rules somewhat like that. Dave, K2YG On 1/29/2017 12:00
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-01/msg00099.html (7,555 bytes)

56. Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK on Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:58:35 -0500
Tim, it's a fine idea to encourage more use of RTTY during FD, but I think there is a basic problem that will be difficult to overcome. PSK is an easier mode for non-digital types to operate compared
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-02/msg00202.html (10,871 bytes)

57. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 171, Issue 7 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:44:32 -0500
9X2AW has been on 20 meter JT65, sometimes operating with a unique style: If you call on other than his last freqency after he sends his report message to another station, he may respond on your freq
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00019.html (7,828 bytes)

58. [RTTY] Multi-channel Decoding (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 08:23:53 -0400
Do multi-channel decoders ever decode as well as single channel decoders? Dave, K2YG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00048.html (6,358 bytes)

59. Re: [RTTY] Greater than 600 watts for RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:39:54 -0400
If you're out to win a contest in the high power category, or to get rare ones on the first or second call, go for the max. But here 400 watts or less has gotten 344 DXCC entities on RTTY, 5 watts ha
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00082.html (7,421 bytes)

60. Re: [RTTY] Greater than 600 watts for RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:56:49 -0400
Propagation Place Power and Antenna Proficiency The sequence is debatable except for #1. Dave, K2YG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00113.html (8,398 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu