Mail Archive Search: <+from:mda@n1en.org>

Results:

References: [ +from:mda@n1en.org: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... EMERGENCY NETWORK (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:24:19 +0000; Re steering clear of 070-080: are those dial frequencies, or actual transmit frequencies? On my K3 when operating FSK, my dial frequency reads 1.955-2.125 kc above my diddles. Thus, if I operate RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00050.html (9,573 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... EMERGENCY NETWORK (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:54:23 +0000; FSK, although I meant to write "below". I wonder if I have a setting set oddly somewhere, then. That, or when I conducted an experiment with someone to test dial versus transmit frequencies, we both; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00053.html (9,303 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] ARRL board of Directors meeting this week (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:20:54 +0000; I've kept my mouth shut because I'm a fairly new subscriber to the list, and my own views on the subject probably wouldn't be particularly popular here....but I've never been that successful at self-; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00273.html (8,685 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] IC-7100 (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:46:30 +0000; I recently swapped in an IC7100 as my number two radio, replacing an IC7000 that will be going mobile. I also just took the station out for a very quick test-drive in the 2200Z practice session, the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00158.html (7,451 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 23:35:27 +0000; I would be very careful going there. That kind of phenomenon is probably due to either someone having a misconfigured station, using a deprecated mode (e.g. Pactor 1), and/or expecting miracles in th; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00194.html (10,347 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 135, Issue 33 (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:35:43 +0000; Most of them...at least the clueful ones... know they don't need much bandwidth for position reports (although the need for ARQ does add to the overhead). The need for bandwidth/speed arises when the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00198.html (8,513 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 135, Issue 33 (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:14:37 +0000; In real-world practice, your mileage can vary significantly depending on the modes involved. For example, in MARS, I've seen where one of the STANAG waveforms that's being adopted works best if you c; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00202.html (12,210 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Outside US (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:49:37 +0000; The ZIP code I usually use in response to silly requests for that data is 96598, state=AP (if available as an option) or CA (if AP isn't a pick). It is a real ZIP code, but mail service there is a bi; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00170.html (7,156 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:55:13 +0000; Actually, I thought the point that NQ4U was trying to make is that much of the time when there's an issue with Winlink QRM in North America, it's likely because an actual human simply clicked "connec; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00318.html (10,199 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:12:16 +0000; I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. In some circles, there is a saying: never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to stupidity. As we are supposed to be self-policing service; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00325.html (9,915 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:23:56 +0000; I don't think anyone's saying that. The most likely explanation for what was observed, however, was that someone keyed up without listening (or simply not caring, or to get his jollies by creating ad; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00326.html (10,435 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] W1AW CW on 3581.5kc (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:30:21 +0000; Just remember that it could always be worse. Here in the metro Hartford area, the W1AW bulletins make a great way to test the effectiveness of one's filtering. :) -- Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.o; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00012.html (7,061 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:13:33 +0000; I'm not the Mike to whom the question was asked, but I would point out that I'm pretty sure this particular equine carcass was likely adequately flogged as part of the K1MAN case. Looking through the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00104.html (9,034 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Field Day 2014 (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:36:36 +0000; This was my fourth Field Day; I operated from home because work needed me to stay close to the phone and internet. I don't know whether it was because I was operating from home with a potentially bet; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00298.html (10,231 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandplan Committee report online (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 02:34:27 +0000; Actually, I parsed that paragraph as "some folks would like to see designated subbands to be used only by/with automated services". In other words: a Winlink + ALE - only subband. A no-RTTY zone from; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-08/msg00018.html (8,939 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] W3LPL RTTY Spots? (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:41:16 +0000; The way I view it is that W3LPL is bringing over "interesting" spots from the RBN (which is increasingly including RTTY, especially during contests), to make them accessible to those who do not want; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00122.html (8,373 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Getting spotted by RTTY skimmers (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:09:18 +0000; There are notes in the second section of http://wz7i.com/cw-skimmer/rtty-skimmer.html The primary trick is to leave trailing whitespace at the end of the over. I used "TEST N1EN N1EN CQ " (Ģnote the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00135.html (9,329 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Getting spotted by RTTY skimmers (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:53:59 +0000; I'm not disagreeing, and I may be editing my macros to reflect this. (This was the first RTTY contest I was very active in where the RTTY skimmer network was robust enough to be a significant conside; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00139.html (10,126 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Point-and-click vs typing (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:57:43 +0000; I am a relative newbie in RTTY contesting. I'm also a trackball user, which I prefer because it requires less motion and is more precise than a mouse. This past weekend, I had my trackball sitting im; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00166.html (9,392 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] CR/LF, SP, or something better for RTTY (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 16:14:13 +0000; Caveat: I haven't tried the demo, so I might be making a bad assumption here. As I understand it, this is an attempt to respond to the concerns some people have with scrolling making point-and-click; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00073.html (10,649 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]