Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:keepwalking188@ac0c.com: 156 ]

Total 156 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:54:44 -0500
A very very good thing indeed... 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) Why do RTTY ops even put a "cq" at the end of their cq message? CW ops nev
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00192.html (11,363 bytes)

62. Re: [RTTY] Wanna Work More Stations? Have more fun? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 21:57:59 -0500
Great work Hank! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie You are cooking right along in a RTTY contest, working station after station, but your rate isn't so hot? How come you aren't wor
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00058.html (18,950 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] Wanna Work More Stations? Have more fun? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 19:51:05 -0500
Bill, you are very right. A 2 second savings on a hard and long contest run (maybe 2800 Q?) would be more than 1.5 hour saved. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00065.html (9,401 bytes)

64. Re: [RTTY] Contester preference - 1- versus 2-decimal-place spots (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:15:35 -0500
There are several issues being comingled here. I think that the absolute accuracy of the spot is more important. If you are running S&P assisted, and the spots are accurate, then with a tight AFC you
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00081.html (11,663 bytes)

65. Re: [RTTY] Contester preference - 1- versus 2-decimal-place spots (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:37:24 -0500
It's probably even more important to the average RTTY contester who cannot run as much as he would like, for whatever reason. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message--
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00084.html (13,566 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 14:33:24 -0600
I saw quite a number of spots from guys grumbling about VP8SGI running RTTY on 7040 and that being a JT or some other digital mode special frequency. Guess they have not heard the rule with respect t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00052.html (18,147 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] Simple thing that seemed to improve my S&Ping (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:52:13 -0600
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's the responsibility of the other guy to get your call right. You are not penalized if he gets your call wrong in a log check. You are only penalized if you get his ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00058.html (8,817 bytes)

68. Re: [RTTY] Simple thing that seemed to improve my S&Ping (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:31:29 -0600
Beyond the gentlemen's point of a possible DXCC entry, there is no benefit to making sure the OTHER guy has your call right. It's rare for me to find a new RTTY country in the middle of a contest but
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00067.html (11,589 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:44:16 -0600
If you don't want to wait, move on. There are plenty of other guys to work. And don't assume it's always some So2r thing. If you have fumbled a callsign correction or stuck the number in the RST fiel
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00091.html (7,738 bytes)

70. Re: [RTTY] Simple thing that seemed to improve my S&Ping (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:28:49 -0600
That's what I do as well. At the start. If it's at the end, I worry the guy is focused on grabbing the SN and may miss the meaning of the repeated call. TU 599 1234... becomes AC0C AC0C TU 599 1234..
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00134.html (10,190 bytes)

71. Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:23:30 -0600
The guys keying into the K3 are slow - especially if they make a mistake on sending their SN. But my hope is that after playing with the toy-K3 keying method, they get seduced by RTTY contesting and
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00135.html (9,847 bytes)

72. Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:25:39 -0600
This feature falls into the category of things that we can do - but probably should not do. Personally I could not envision working a RTTY contest by paddle interface and coming away from the experie
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00154.html (10,428 bytes)

73. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:42:21 -0600
Maybe they are doing that on purpose - maybe not. I can easily believe it's an oversight on a macro setup - done that myself a few times over the years - and it's one of those things you may not actu
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00181.html (13,341 bytes)

74. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:44:30 -0600
Oops. Yes, it's 599 in my RTTY macros. I've just manually sent 5nn in CW so many times now when I think of RST, it comes out 5nn even when it's not a cut character. ha ha. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com a
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00184.html (9,547 bytes)

75. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:52:58 -0600
I can see Bill's point. Do it once with what is clearly overkill but then you can be sure it's done. I dont' have to send repeats too much and in that case, I find 3x on the resend of the exchange to
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00219.html (11,757 bytes)

76. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:02:33 -0600
That's not at all what Hank's saying. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie --Original Message-- From: Phil Sussman Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 4:46 PM To: Hank Garretson Cc: iw1
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00238.html (11,563 bytes)

77. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:09:25 -0600
I sent in my WPX log in yesterday and had to fix about 8 QSO where I had entered the received exchange in the sent RST box (easy to do with N1MM) - the changes required by the log web site robot. It'
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00257.html (15,267 bytes)

78. Re: [RTTY] Robot Processing RST (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:09:00 -0600
Thanks Ed for the clarification. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie The log submission robots' purpose is to check format and give feedback when there is an error. It checks that th
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00259.html (10,900 bytes)

79. [RTTY] NAQP @ 10m (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:34:16 -0600
Looking at the 3830 scores, it seems like 10m favored the west coast and to a lesser extent, the south and east. While there may have been plenty of 10m RF flying OVER the midwest, almost none of it
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00300.html (6,942 bytes)

80. Re: [RTTY] NAQP @ 10m (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:32:30 -0600
I can personally confirm that whatever the origin, the black hole nickname is definitely warranted! 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) Looking
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00305.html (8,905 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu