Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0xu@iowadsl.net: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Mailing List (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:52:48 -0500
Whenever I was subscribed to a list on yahoo, my spam level went up an order of magnitude. I will not subscribe with this addy to anything on yahoo. They must make a mint selling addys to spammers. A
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00074.html (8,257 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Mailing List (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 06:27:50 -0500
I don't get nearly as many as when I was signed up for a yahoo group with all the options turned off. This happened to me with 2 previous ISPs so I decided to try not signing up for them with the las
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00077.html (9,733 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:12:46 -0500
What he means is using the calls that many times like: K0XU K0XU K0XU DE AB8NI AB8NI AB8NI Is what he means by 3 X 3 At 12:57 PM 9/27/2004, roofus wrote: Phil could you please explain your use of 3 X
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00248.html (8,849 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] /? suffix (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:39:55 -0500
Actually I think he is asking about Eqsl not LoTW. I have noticed that there is no way to tie your records for different calls together on Eqsl. So you cannot combine logs for your old & new calls fo
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00378.html (9,031 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Had to QRT in CQ WPX RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:49:45 -0600
It may not work for mult-ops. etc, but I have always set may AutoSaveCount to 1. I have never lost a Q to a computer problem, but then I may just be lucky. However with a reasonably fast machine I do
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00179.html (8,505 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: Rigblaster- worth the money? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 21:46:59 -0500
If he can't figure out how to get himself off, I would just set up a filter & ignore him. If he can't help himself and you have tried I don't know what else you can do. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00030.html (11,760 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Comments on "RigExpert" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:49:18 -0500
They have moved the sound card out of the computer & into their box. How is this going to make it better? Just proves that his sound card isn't set up right. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experie
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00038.html (10,795 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:16:41 -0500
Well maybe I am using "old" math, but I get 30 hours out of that. Not meaning to nitpick. Maybe a 80-40-20 format or ??? Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when e
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00216.html (10,880 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] [WriteLog] slow fsk speed (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:33:01 -0500
It seems like I had to DECREASE the Priority on the Misc setup screen. (Or was that to get the data to start sooner after PTT enabled?) Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you h
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00255.html (8,399 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:15:54 -0600
OK, I have to put a word in here. This is amateur radio. Why would we need a protocol that required a $1K modem to decode? What are we (at least some of us) doing that makes it necessary to transmit
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00370.html (9,504 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] [WriteLog] North Dakota, please submit (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:18:50 -0600
When did LOTW start doing WAS? Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00415.html (8,562 bytes)

12. [RTTY] Tom & Joe - Take it outside. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:27:32 -0600
Please release us from your shouting match. You are both right, you are both wrong. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone. _____________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00041.html (6,328 bytes)

13. [RTTY] Quiet PC power supply? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:21:38 -0600
I find myself looking for an RF quiet pc power supply. Anybody have any suggestions? Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone. ____________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00172.html (6,775 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] was certificate (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:29:08 -0500
What might happened is that your Arkansas contact uploaded a new file with his station location changed or left off of the properties on the new file, thus changing all of the duplicate contacts uplo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00118.html (9,378 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Round Up Certificate (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:10:59 -0500
I guess the mail just runs a little slower out here. Just got my SOLP NE section first place cert today! (K0IDT must have been somewhere else that weekend) Thanks to everyone in the log Jim Rhodes K0
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-06/msg00027.html (7,452 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Level Playing Field is unrealistic (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:13:42 -0500
I have really tried to stay out of this, but. In other words you are saying that the High School kids should play against the pros and and just say "We did as good as we could" Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rh
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00292.html (8,197 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Level Playing Field is unrealistic (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:44:33 -0500
The same logic could be used for and against having high/low power or assisted/unassisted classes. Personally I am not sure which side I am on in this debate. However it seems to me that the SOmR peo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00305.html (8,605 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:22:11 -0500
And we all know that is where the SO1R guys belong!! Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone. ____________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00441.html (10,305 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] W4UK - WAS totals on LoTW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:55:00 -0500
Also the OTHER station must have uploaded the state information for it to show up in the totals. So if you haven't set your station location in TQSL, please do so, then upload your log again. I have
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00537.html (9,326 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Hall of Shame (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:17:10 -0500
Well if the purpose of the beacons is to be able to see what is propagating, what tells that even more is a DX contest. Maybe we need more contests & fewer beacons. I tuned PAST 14.100 many times thi
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00152.html (8,533 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu