Mail Archive Search: <+from:heartdoc@nwtcc.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:heartdoc@nwtcc.com: 88 ]

Total 88 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:28:58 -0500; I changed it to /0 when I saw it. It was simply proper syntax - he was in ND. 73, Jamie WB4YDL Well I sure hope they (W4HOD/O) don't change it Because then all of us that don't make any changes in th; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00140.html (9,887 bytes)
42. Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:22:20 -0500; Yea, yea, I know ! :)) It just offended my sensibilities to see a /O ! I may get dinged for it, but I feel better ! HI There were a couple ND stations on yesterday, but where was SD ?? The NE states; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00148.html (9,864 bytes)
43. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Newby (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 19:25:11 -0500; Hi Barrie: Well you caught me on a break with the TN QSO Party and I'm going all RTTY. One of my two radios is the Mark V. I had also the RG Plus and Pro at one time. The RB Pro is quite easy to wire; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-09/msg00006.html (8,476 bytes)
44. [RTTY] WB4YDL - CQWW RTTY SOSB 15 HP (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:22:42 -0500; CQWWRTTY Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2011-09-23 CallSign Used : WB4YDL Operator(s) : WB4YDL Operator Category : SINGLE-OP Band : 15M Power : HIGH Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : 04 TN Gridsquare; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-09/msg00093.html (7,894 bytes)
45. [RTTY] First Plaque !! (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:38:37 -0600; Thanks to ARRL and to Roland NA5Q for the beautiful plaque for Delta Division winner of the 2011 ARRL RU SOHP. This is my first plaque EVER for any contest !! J 73, Jamie WB4YDL -- This message has b; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-12/msg00072.html (6,475 bytes)
46. [RTTY] WB4YDL ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 20:11:47 -0600; ARRLRTTY Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2012-01-07 CallSign Used : WB4YDL Operator(s) : WB4YDL Operator Category : SINGLE-OP Band : ALL Power : HIGH Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : TN Gridsquare : E; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-01/msg00031.html (7,491 bytes)
47. [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY - WB4YDL (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:34:03 -0600; CQ WPX RTTY Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2012-02-10 CallSign Used : WB4YDL Operator(s) : WB4YDL Operator Category : SINGLE-OP Band : ALL Power : HIGH Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : 001 Gridsquare; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00133.html (8,191 bytes)
48. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:58:33 -0600; This is really hard to take sometimes. I had a dupe rate of 1.7% - in this day and age of computer logging, this seems WAY too high. There was one K4 who was about to get on my last nerve who was a d; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00155.html (10,311 bytes)
49. Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:33:28 -0600; Alejandro: I had 31 in my log !! I don't think you'll have a problem. :) BTW, thanks for the Q's. 73, Jamie WB4YDL Well, my logic is to avoid dupes on my log, however it's a good point what you state; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00165.html (15,091 bytes)
50. Re: [RTTY] SO2R Problem (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:59:38 -0600; I'm thinking about adding stubs to my SO2R setup. I use the TXBPF filters and they work great, but I was crawling way up the band on 20M and also looking at 40M, and I could see myself on the P3 pana; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00242.html (10,668 bytes)
51. [RTTY] WB4YDL - NAQP RTTY Team #1 (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:53:05 -0600; NAQP RTTY Score Summary Sheet Start Date : 2012-02-25 CallSign Used : WB4YDL Operator(s) : WB4YDL Operator Category : SINGLE-OP Band : ALL Power : LOW Mode : RTTY Default Exchange : JAMIE TN Gridsqua; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00330.html (7,392 bytes)
52. Re: [RTTY] What does it take to finish in the top 10? (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:58:49 -0600; Hi Al: Well get ready - this is going to be a good thread ! HI I see already some interesting comments by Dave K6LL. In my case (and I'm NOT in the Top 10 in anything), I've been using RTTY as my pre; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00341.html (13,398 bytes)
53. Re: [RTTY] WB4YDL - NAQP RTTY Team #1 (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:36:28 -0600; Tennessee Contest Group !! Sorta like a PVRC group, only better !! :) 73, Jamie WB4YDL --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John GW; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00344.html (9,164 bytes)
54. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on60 Meters (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:37:57 -0500; Ohhhhh, this should be interesting. What technological advantages are there to AFSK ?? It is SOOoooo much easier to do FSK IMHO. Radios such as the K3 do make it easy with either FSK or AFSK. But wha; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00170.html (9,005 bytes)
55. [RTTY] FSKit again (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:35:29 -0500; Hi guys: I received my May QST today and was intrigued by the cover photo. Then I tried to remember something about FSKit mentioned here before. I did a quick check of the archives but couldn't find; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00076.html (6,548 bytes)
56. [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Roundup - WB4YDL (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 20:00:34 -0600; ARRL RTTY Roundup Call: WB4YDL Operator(s): WB4YDL Station: WB4YDL Class: Single Op LP Default Exchange: TN QTH: EM56 Name: James C. Hall Club: Tennessee Contest Group Operating Time 9hrs) : 18 hrs S; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00028.html (7,748 bytes)
57. [RTTY] WB4YDL CQ WPX RTTY SOSB80 (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:28:04 -0600; CQ WPX RTTY Score Summary Start Date: 2013-02-08 Callsign Used: WB4YDL Operator: WB4YDL Operator Category: SINGLE-OP Band: 80M Power: High Mode: RTTY Default Exchange: 001 Name: James C. Hall ARRL Se; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00181.html (7,744 bytes)
58. [RTTY] WB4YDL NAQP RTTY SOAB LP (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:41:12 -0600; North American QSO Party, RTTY - February Call: WB4YDL Operator(s): WB4YDL Station: WB4YDL Class: Single Op LP QTH: UNION CITY, TN Operating Time (hrs): 9.5 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 80: 171 45 40:; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00437.html (8,297 bytes)
59. Re: [RTTY] Field Day Digital: PSK vs RTTY (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:00:14 -0500; This year at Reelfoot Amateur Radio Club FD operation, we had more interest in digital operations and decided to venture back into class 3A. Two years ago, we had a dedicated station for digital and; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00011.html (8,642 bytes)
60. Re: [RTTY] Field Day Digital (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:03:50 -0500; Personally, I found it to be more difficult to contest with PSK31 than with RTTY. Using the N1MM logger and flDigi engine, the technique as I was watching a relatively new ham work, was to open up th; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00027.html (9,271 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]