I changed it to /0 when I saw it. It was simply proper syntax - he was in
ND.
73, Jamie
WB4YDL
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of jim
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 11:07 AM
To: 'Tom Osborne'; 'RTTY'
Subject: Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP
Well I sure hope they (W4HOD/O) don't change it
Because then all of us that don't make any changes in the log
Will have it wrong as I logged what they sent...
Am I looking at this incorrect ?
The CQing guys must have heck with the very very short exchanges ..
from the shack of
WB5AAA
73 de JIM
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Tom Osborne
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 10:04 AM
To: RTTY
Subject: Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP
And did you notice they were sending "O" the letter "O" instead of zero "0"
as in W4HOD/O instead
of W4HOD/0 ? hi ... Wonder how many contacts got logged that way. Stuff
happens I guess.
Hi Don
Maybe using cut numbers in RTTY :-) 73
Tom W7WHY
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|