Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 330 ]

Total 330 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [RTTY] VU4 RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:21:08 -0800
I understand, but you would have worked the path, just from the other end. It would be your home QTH, your rig, your antenna, everything the same except a guest op. And if you had been standing besid
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00179.html (8,752 bytes)

102. Re: [RTTY] Reverse DXCC (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:23:01 -0800
That has to be a record, surely! Thanks for the tidbit, Dick. -- Bill, W6WRT On Monday, December 20, 2004 10:58 AM, Dick Kriss, AA5VU <aa5vu@arrl.net> wrote: Bill's message reminded me of a guy I use
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00225.html (7,385 bytes)

103. Re: [RTTY] QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:05:44 -0800
___________________________________________________________ The input signal to the transmitter is different when using AFSK vs FSK. The AFSK signal (USB or LSB mode) is two audio tones fed into eith
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00250.html (8,225 bytes)

104. Re: [RTTY] No GU0SUP for a while! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:28:10 -0800
___________________________________________________________ Sorry to hear that, Phil. Thank goodness it was no worse. A contest without GU0SUP just won't be the same! -- Bill, W6WRT _________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00252.html (7,866 bytes)

105. Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:56:40 -0800
I have always run out of contest time with people still to work, hasn't everyone? Who has ever worked *every* station active during a contest? Not me for sure. And what better way to encourage folks
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00261.html (7,409 bytes)

106. Re: [RTTY] QUESTION & ANSWER (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:37:37 -0800
___________________________________________________________ I agree about the capacitor from collector to ground, but the resistor from base to ground isn't really necessary. Many hams don't know it,
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00267.html (8,125 bytes)

107. [RTTY] W6WRT Roundup Practice (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:35:48 -0800
That was fun! Barely got the rig warmed up, but everything worked except the operator who pressed the wrong key now and then, as usual. Nothing heard on 20 at all. Hmmmmm... -- Bill, W6WRT ROUNDUP PR
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00270.html (7,392 bytes)

108. Re: [RTTY] QUESTION & ANSWER (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:38:44 -0800
___________________________________________________________ A diode is fine, except it's another thing to fail. They are pretty reliable, so not much to worry about. -- Bill, W6WRT __________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00271.html (7,604 bytes)

109. Re: [RTTY] QUESTION & ANSWER (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:52:52 -0800
___________________________________________________________ Adding the base to emitter resistor simply creates a 2:1 voltage divider which reduces the strength of the keying signal and any RF or othe
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00278.html (8,167 bytes)

110. Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 10:11:05 -0800
___________________________________________________________ Does anyone know if RTTY WAS has ever been achieved on 160? I'd like to think that is one challenge yet to be done. I only need 45 more. --
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00006.html (7,200 bytes)

111. Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:00:05 -0800
___________________________________________________________ I think the only reason people group together there is a combination of tradition and SWR. I'm not aware of any 160m antenna that covers th
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00033.html (8,440 bytes)

112. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Callsign Database (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:35:44 -0800
___________________________________________________________ He might have been working W7TI, who is still in there. At least W7LZP is gone. :-) -- Bill, W6WRT ex-W7TI, W7LZP _________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00048.html (8,000 bytes)

113. Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:13:20 -0800
___________________________________________________________ Given the EU allocation for RTTY at 7035-7045, that is where you are likely to hear the US stations operating. Above and below that should
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00077.html (8,515 bytes)

114. Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:07:07 -0800
___________________________________________________________ The correct response? Almost anything from another CQ to a quick carrier, I'd think. Just something to show someone's there. -- Bill, W6WRT
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00079.html (8,223 bytes)

115. [RTTY] W6WRT Roundup Score (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:01:55 -0800
Had a scare right at the start of the contest. My rotator hung up and would not turn at all. Fiddled with it a few minutes and it started working. It worked fine the rest of the contest, but as they
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00112.html (8,112 bytes)

116. Re: [RTTY] Help with keeping RF out of PC (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:53:31 -0800
___________________________________________________________ You were lucky. Often, adding a ground makes the problem worse, not better, especially at higher frequencies. Remember, a ground wire 1/4 w
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00182.html (8,997 bytes)

117. Re: [RTTY] ARRL robot? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:22:43 -0800
___________________________________________________________ I did receive a confirmation. The list of logs received is at http://www.arrl.org/contests/claimed/logs_rx.html?con_id=85 They say it's upd
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00187.html (7,145 bytes)

118. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:58:03 -0800
___________________________________________________________ If I understand you correctly, the %X macro would REPEAT my report back to me? Please, never never do this during a contest. During a ragch
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00325.html (9,639 bytes)

119. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:01:58 -0800
___________________________________________________________ I wish there was a good way to require a 'real' RST. IOW, a log full of nothing but sent 599 would be DQ'd. Trouble is, someone would proba
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00338.html (9,785 bytes)

120. Re: [RTTY] my pathetic bartg score (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:51:47 -0800
___________________________________________________________ Beat me out by one Q. Rats! -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00342.html (6,870 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
This search system is powered by Namazu