RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting

To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY Contesting
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@ispwest.com
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:00:05 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:02:53 +0000, K4SB wrote:

>I have never quite understood why everyone insists on operating at the
>bottom of the band while at the top end, antennas are shorter, prop is
>better, and no bitching from other modes.
___________________________________________________________

I think the only reason people group together there is a combination
of tradition and SWR.  I'm not aware of any 160m antenna that covers
the whole band with acceptable SWR.  If there is one, please let me
know.

I work some CW occasionally on 160 and it's all at the low end.  I'm
open to suggestions for a high- and low-end antenna.

-- 
Bill, W6WRT



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 1/3/2005

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>