Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Private\s+side\s+vs\.\s+public\s+side\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: wireless@peake.com
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:07:26 -0400
Do most folks give the end user a password to access the private side of the CPE? Chris wireless@peake.com -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/F-Prot AV]
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00093.html (7,842 bytes)

2. Re: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@bextreme.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:13:16 -0500
I didn't realize that there were two levels on the CPE side but I'd have to say NO. Why would you let them? I'd say you are just asking for trouble.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00095.html (8,607 bytes)

3. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:39:23 -0500
depends on whether the customer buys the CPE or not if we lease/loan the CPE to customer, then no if customer purchases the CPE, we give em everything -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00096.html (7,844 bytes)

4. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 19:57:50 -0400
No, we own the equipment, its part of our MANAGED network plan. We monitor the link and the bandwidth for each device. The customer is happier that they don't have to program anything or deal with an
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00098.html (9,006 bytes)

5. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 20:12:18 -0400
Dan, I notice on your web site that you are offering a 768K/128K residential service. Are you using Karlnet to deliver this service? If so, how are you throttling the bandwidth asynchronously? Bill
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00100.html (8,345 bytes)

6. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 20:47:26 -0400
Bill, Yes we do offer a 768k/128k service for the residential market, and yes I do use Karlnet to control bandwidth, I set the bandwidth on the wireless side to 128k and 768k on the Ethernet side. On
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00101.html (9,673 bytes)

7. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:46:22 -0400
So I didn't know this was possible. Can you explain to me why you set the wireless side to 128K and the ethernet side to 768K ? Thanks bill
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00102.html (8,731 bytes)

8. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:47:15 -0400
Bill, We set the wireless side to 128k because that LIMITS how much data the CPE can move onto the wireless network, (uploading in this case as the data is coming from the CPE), and then we limit the
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00103.html (9,863 bytes)

9. Re: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "hfl-lists" <hfl-lists@stormcrows.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:58:47 -0500
is side ethernet
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00104.html (10,987 bytes)

10. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:17:50 -0400
So I thought that when you set the limit on a port, that it was bi-directional. Where did you read that it was one direction? In other words, when you set the bandwidth limit on the wireless port, w
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00105.html (9,539 bytes)

11. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:29:42 -0400
If you give them everything technically they can control how much bandwidth they receive plus gain access to info about your network. Does not seem like a good idea, would not recommend this to my cu
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00107.html (8,734 bytes)

12. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Tony " <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 01:39:50 -0400
Bill Take a look at the docs on our site (http://www.demarctech.com/downloads/demarc-turbocell-manual.pdf) "1.1.5 - Max Tx Rate KBits/Sec If you wish to limit the maximum data transmit rate for a par
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00108.html (11,215 bytes)

13. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:11:49 -0500
no, w/ RGs, you c an just enter it in -Charles is side ethernet _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00109.html (11,317 bytes)

14. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:21:13 -0500
btw, a few things have changed w/ v 4.x -Charles
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00110.html (9,961 bytes)

15. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:42:21 -0400
No we hard code the settings Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com 781-658-2075 www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com is side ethernet ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00111.html (11,837 bytes)

16. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:42:43 -0400
Its actually just the TX rate on the interface Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com 781-658-2075 www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com So I thought that when you set the limit o
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00112.html (10,063 bytes)

17. Re: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <npyoung@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:50:43 -0700
Dan, I've tried this and I'm seeing some strange stuff. Like it appears that setting the BW limit in either interface sets the d/l speed for the customer, with the lowest number predominating. For ex
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00113.html (11,293 bytes)

18. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 03:07:13 -0400
So why hasnt anyone answer this question yet? Bill
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00115.html (12,410 bytes)

19. Re: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <npyoung@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 09:40:08 -0700
I don't know. I'm still investigating my results. I'll share my information as I get more data. Norm the this other last.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00126.html (13,446 bytes)

20. RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side (score: 1)
Author: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 18:48:23 -0400
What version of karlnet Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com 781-658-2075 www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com Dan, I've tried this and I'm seeing some strange stuff. Like it a
/archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00132.html (11,561 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu