Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Karlnet\s+vs\s+Lucent\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: Peter Dordik <dordik@presov.viapvt.sk>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:53:26 +0100
Kevin told us (several months ago), that upgrade from orinoco firmware (COR, ROR) to Karlnet Base and Satellite will be soon. I will be glad, if there will be upgrade for classic AP too (AP500, AP100
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00003.html (10,924 bytes)

2. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:15:01 -0500
My apologies, but I seem to be missing something. As of this writing, I have several "classic" pieces of hardware (serial 00-Ut, etc. indicates their manufacture was in 2000) running Karlnet's latest
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00004.html (11,803 bytes)

3. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:05:01 -0600
All, What Peter is referring too is getting an upgrade from the COR/ROR version of our software. In the past, when we had a contract with Agere, we were prohibited from selling the upgrade. We are no
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00005.html (13,081 bytes)

4. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:27:19 -0600
Whoa....wait a minute..... You are telling me that I can now "upgrade" at the "upgrade" pricing, my COR/ROR units? I don't have to purchase the entire license? -bob
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00006.html (15,192 bytes)

5. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:32:31 -0600
Bob, That is correct. We will have an announcement about this in the next week or so. We are just trying to get the paperwork issue figured out. I will post on this list when we have the details. Kev
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00007.html (16,239 bytes)

6. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:22:52 -0600
That is awesome. I've got about 5 COR's that I'd like to get to 4.31 or so. I'm having some latency issues with the second wireless interface and I've heard that the newer FW fixes it? thanks, Bob --
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00008.html (18,469 bytes)

7. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:32:16 -0500
I see about an average of 30 ms with 15 ROR (satellites) talking to 1 COR (base). The average is for all units total. 30% of them actually return a <10ms response! I am happy with this latency and am
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00009.html (19,485 bytes)

8. [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: Blair Drew Davis <theory@datawise.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:31:40 -0500
Recently, with assistance from Ed at Karlnet, we found a work around for a for a latency and packet loss issue. We operate a geographically large wisp in Allegan, MI. We use Lucent hardware for our t
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00198.html (7,898 bytes)

9. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:23:18 -0500
Good day to you. I have experience in the equipment you mention and can offer relation as way to help. I have a extremely similar network, with a piece of equipment running as a "COR master" (commonl
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00205.html (9,162 bytes)

10. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:26:14 -0600
I see high latency between the vendors implementations. ....in the range of 3 - 130ms.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00206.html (10,330 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu