Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Flashrom\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Flashrom\s+Question\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:14:39 -0500; I am trying to settle on using the new WPBase boards for Flashrom for a new tower. My experience so far has been AP1000's only. I think the AP1000's are 66Mhz and the WPBase is 133MHz. I guess I am j; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00094.html (8,528 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:10:16 -0500; Hmmmm, I hesitate to give the "OFFICIAL" Karlnet response! ;) My response is two parts: 1. Without question a Flashrom with a suitable motherboard (say 233Mhz or faster) is better than our WPRG+ Boar; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00098.html (9,743 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:29:46 -0500; Yes, but what about the WPBASE+ board? for that new so,; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00099.html (11,000 bytes)
4. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:34:35 -0500; The WPBASE+ board is the same as the WPRG+ board with an additional Ethernet and Radio slot. You do not gain processing power. Another issue (for me) is that I think the flashroms are bit cumbersome.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00100.html (12,114 bytes)
5. Re: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:43:23 -0500; Well, this brings about my next question for the list. Is there a list of motherboards people have had good results with and can vouch for compatibility? I don't ever see using Flashrom for client si; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00101.html (14,069 bytes)
6. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:53:42 -0500; We have a list of Motherboards. Problem is that I do not believe they are in production anymore! I know we have FLASHROM users on the list- so what are you guys using? Kevin Well, this brings about m; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00102.html (14,869 bytes)
7. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:53:42 -0500; Oh, and I should have told you all this: The extra processing power is needed to help with the Superpacket aggregation- packing and unpacking that data, on top of polling, takes processing power. Thi; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00103.html (15,184 bytes)
8. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:54:27 -0600; Based on processor speed alone, What is the recommended number of users to have per WPBASE board without seeing a significant performance decrease for each user? Oh, and I should have told you all th; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00104.html (15,895 bytes)
9. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:10:05 -0500; Andy, Impossible to answer. What kind of traffic, corporate or residential clients, are you throttling bandwidth, etc. Too many variables for us to test. Kevin Based on processor speed alone, What is; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00105.html (16,462 bytes)
10. Re: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:16:31 -0500; My reasoning for going Flashrom is that I am competing heavily with Cable Modems and so I need to deliver as much speed as possible. Throttling will be turned off completely and handled at the NOC. I; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00106.html (19,090 bytes)
11. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:18:49 -0600; One site is strictly residential based upon the location. But other sites are a 60/40 maybe 70/30 mix Res with business. If we have any corporate users we push them towards our SDSL or T1 services. P; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00107.html (17,055 bytes)
12. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:27:55 -0500; Generally speaking, ALL Kernels are released at the same time. There have been very few exceptions to this. Kevin My reasoning for going Flashrom is that I am competing heavily with Cable Modems and; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00108.html (19,612 bytes)
13. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:31:34 -0500; Andy, It is still to difficult to give you a number. The variables are way to numerous! Kevin One site is strictly residential based upon the location. But other sites are a 60/40 maybe 70/30 mix Res; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00109.html (17,555 bytes)
14. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:28:43 -0600; All I am really wondering is if at some point the processor is the slowest player on the team and will effect performance b4 the license limit is reached. Andy, It is still to difficult to give you a; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00110.html (18,015 bytes)
15. Re: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <bruno@openline.com.br>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:41:40 -0300; Hello there Are there karlnet releases for Soekris boards like the new NET4801 (266MHz)? and for the old net4511/net4521? if so, are they CF based or flashed over the board BIOS? Cheers !3runo; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00111.html (9,075 bytes)
16. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:46:20 -0500; I would think that is POSSIBLE with an WPRG+ board, but VERY doubtful with a FLASHROM. Kevin All I am really wondering is if at some point the processor is the slowest player on the team and will eff; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00112.html (18,505 bytes)
17. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:27:53 -0500; would fall under the SV license series...TurboCell for the compact flash -Charles Hello there Are there karlnet releases for Soekris boards like the new NET4801 (266MHz)? and for the old net4511/net4; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00117.html (9,766 bytes)
18. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:14:58 -0500; We support the Net 4510. Hello there Are there karlnet releases for Soekris boards like the new NET4801 (266MHz)? and for the old net4511/net4521? if so, are they CF based or flashed over the board B; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00121.html (9,773 bytes)
19. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:24:15 -0500; First let me say that this does not apply to those WISP's who only see a maximum of 20 or 30 residential clients on a single AP. In some tiny towns, the cheap solution is the best way to go. For the; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00126.html (13,135 bytes)
20. Re: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:34:19 -0500; Can you tell us more about this? What features were you running when you hit the wall?; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00127.html (9,298 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]