Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kknuth@karlnet.com: 305 ]

Total 305 documents matching your query.

61. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:53:42 -0500
We have a list of Motherboards. Problem is that I do not believe they are in production anymore! I know we have FLASHROM users on the list- so what are you guys using? Kevin Well, this brings about m
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00102.html (14,869 bytes)

62. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:53:42 -0500
Oh, and I should have told you all this: The extra processing power is needed to help with the Superpacket aggregation- packing and unpacking that data, on top of polling, takes processing power. Thi
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00103.html (15,184 bytes)

63. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:10:05 -0500
Andy, Impossible to answer. What kind of traffic, corporate or residential clients, are you throttling bandwidth, etc. Too many variables for us to test. Kevin Based on processor speed alone, What is
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00105.html (16,462 bytes)

64. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:27:55 -0500
Generally speaking, ALL Kernels are released at the same time. There have been very few exceptions to this. Kevin My reasoning for going Flashrom is that I am competing heavily with Cable Modems and
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00108.html (19,612 bytes)

65. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:31:34 -0500
Andy, It is still to difficult to give you a number. The variables are way to numerous! Kevin One site is strictly residential based upon the location. But other sites are a 60/40 maybe 70/30 mix Res
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00109.html (17,555 bytes)

66. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 09:46:20 -0500
I would think that is POSSIBLE with an WPRG+ board, but VERY doubtful with a FLASHROM. Kevin All I am really wondering is if at some point the processor is the slowest player on the team and will eff
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00112.html (18,505 bytes)

67. RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:39:02 -0500
Time for me to learn something here: My question about Bandwidth Control Units is this: How do they limit the amount of bandwidth a customer gets? Does it actually stop the wireless device from tryin
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00119.html (10,212 bytes)

68. RE: [Karlnet] Flashrom Question (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:14:58 -0500
We support the Net 4510. Hello there Are there karlnet releases for Soekris boards like the new NET4801 (266MHz)? and for the old net4511/net4521? if so, are they CF based or flashed over the board B
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00121.html (9,773 bytes)

69. [Karlnet] Doug Karl on TECH TV tonight! (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 15:12:12 -0500
If you get the Screen Savers show in your area, Doug Karl will be on tonight! Kevin
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00123.html (9,298 bytes)

70. RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:16:40 -0500
Right, But the BCU is a Layer 2 bridge. It could not stop two wireless devices on the same network from unlimited use. All it can throttle is outbound bandwidth. Correct? Kevin The RF is just the phy
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00124.html (12,579 bytes)

71. RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 07:19:34 -0500
The answer to your question is "NO". Sorry, our bandwidth is just backward of what you would expect! The engineers are trying to find a way to correct this. This is because you are setting OVER THE A
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00133.html (15,397 bytes)

72. RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:13:07 -0500
That would control the OVERALL effective bandwidth. It DOES NOT stop 2 cpe's talking to a base to use unlimited bandwidth to communicate with each other. And you are still filling the air with beacon
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00141.html (11,066 bytes)

73. RE: [Karlnet] Sonicwall / Karlnet latency problem? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:17:58 -0500
Reid, Please contact support for some help on this one! 614-822-0023 Have you tried to do a ping fill to find out exactly where the problem is? Support can walk you through this. Kevin Was wondering
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00146.html (10,857 bytes)

74. RE: [Karlnet] ubicom bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:22:13 -0500
Well you can set it up in RADIUS OR In TurboCell Access List OR You can set it up in the device itself. Of course, this is our standard Synchronous control. Kevin --Original Message-- From: karlnet-b
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00147.html (8,056 bytes)

75. RE: [Karlnet] ubicom bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 20:31:33 -0500
Well I think there is a bug. At speeds above 1.2megs it does not seem to function correctly. That is straight from Reggie in our tech support lab! Other than that, it seems to work. Now if that is NO
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00151.html (9,853 bytes)

76. RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:29:34 -0500
Yes! That is correct. Kevin --Original Message-- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of helio@compuland.com.br Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:09 PM To
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00162.html (10,437 bytes)

77. RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:31:06 -0500
WAIT- The answer is YES. BUT- if you have the Wireless on the RG set to 256, there is no need to set the AP. Setting the AP would control the total amount of bandwidth at the Base! Kevin --Original M
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00163.html (10,468 bytes)

78. RE: [Karlnet] bandwidth management (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:43:51 -0500
Yes, In that scenario, the RG will only be allowed a 256k connection. Kevin --Original Message-- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of helio@compuland
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00165.html (9,549 bytes)

79. RE: [Karlnet] Re: Flashrom Unit, anyone know who made this (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:19:00 -0500
That is an original KarlNet Ethernet to Ethernet firewall- probably running version 1.0 software! Kevin Huh, learn something every day. I stand corrected. Seems http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?V
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00179.html (9,646 bytes)

80. RE: [Karlnet] Need a FlashROM base (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:57:02 -0500
Currently KarlNet does not ship FlashROM units as complete systems, only the FlashROM modules for you to build your own. However, our initial offering of a 5Ghz product will be based on the FlashROM.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00181.html (9,108 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
This search system is powered by Namazu