Thanks to K2AV for writing this for me. For years I've been doing SOMS - Single Op, Multi Station - in the CW SS. That contest becomes really fun when the rate goes *UP* as the contest goes on. Last
What's not to like about this idea? I love it. Send the idea to every member of the ARRL CAC. 73, Hans, K0HB -- 73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a boy and his radio" -- Sea stories at --> http://K0HB.wordpres
The only downside I can see would be if a club with a hundred not-so-serious about winning members, for example, decided they would try to ensure victory for one of their members who was serious abou
This is a very unlikely scenario. It's not clear if you are worried about this being done by a contest club or a general interest club. If the former, a requirement to cease use of the first call aft
That can already be done now... Especially when the second call sign users contact another ten or so non-competitive stations to show that the call sign was just a casual op tuning the band and then
Below If those stations did it with the same operator and the same rig, technically one set of QSO's is illegal under the current rules. They just get away with it because they never submit one or bo
Jim, See below... Jim - How might a requirement to cease use of the first call after a second call is used affect the ability for some number of stations to each make a few contacts with one call and
Couple of things. Current rules say you have to take 30 minutes in an off period. My proposal says that nowhere do the legal on times overlap. With or without the separating off time. If the rule was
Hans wrote: "What's not to like about this idea?" What's not to like about it is, WRTC will officially DISALLOW using any and ALL of your scores with respect to WRTC's ranking/scorekeeping for that e
Geoffrey, I don't think that anyone suggested that it be mandatory for everyone. If it somehow farkles your run at a WRTC spot then you might not want to do it. Meanwhile the universe of SS "players