Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+2006\s+WAE\s+CW\s+\-\s+All\s+3830\s+Claimed\s+Scores\s+Question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 2006 WAE CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores Question (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:10:06 -0400
Hi, In the All 3830 Claimed Scores posting I see EU entries where QTCs exceed QSOs. I also see non-EU entries where QTCs equal QSOs. Given this rule: Each QSO may only be reported once as a QTC. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00262.html (7,441 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WAE CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores Question (score: 1)
Author: "VE3DZ" <va3uz@sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:01:34 -0400
This is true only for stations who transmit QTC. At the receiving end actually it's 10 QTC limit from each station worked. You may have only 3 QSO and receive 10 QTC from each station. That makes it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00268.html (8,086 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WAE CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores Question (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:54:36 +0600
Art, after you have made last qso in the contest you can find someone you have already worked but did not give him QTC yet. Then you can give that person just one (or several) QTC that are still pend
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00274.html (8,745 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WAE CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores Question (score: 1)
Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:32:14 -0400
Now I get it. I see how EUs can get so many QTCs. And I see how non-EUs could have QSOs = QTCs. Obviously the one non-EU with more QTCs is an error. I see some missed out on all of the fun with no QT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00278.html (7,617 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WAE CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores Question (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:34:54 -0400
I think I've seen that before in the printed results, and I wonder if it's indeed a typo or not. I wonder if it's the result of losing credit for some QSOs because log checking caught them, but they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00281.html (8,497 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WAE CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores Question (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:06:42 -0400
I have a certificate on the wall from WAE CW 2004 that has exactly this situation - more QTCs than QSOs, and I assume it must have been due to log checking and deletion of some busted Qs. 73, Pete __
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00284.html (9,262 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu