Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wrt@dslextreme.com: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 08:54:02 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Rubbish. Cheaters not only win, they force the good guys to lose. Cheaters should be rooted out and exposed as much as possible. I can't beli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00093.html (10,560 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 08:56:04 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I run 1.5 kW in RTTY contests and this happens to me all the time. Stations call me that I can just barely tell are there. Obviously they are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00094.html (9,862 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 10:49:23 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I stand by my comments. Your advice was to focus on your own operation and stop whining about cheaters. Totally wrong approach, IMO. -- Bill,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00097.html (10,298 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 08:45:30 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Indirectly, it does help your listening. Running 10 kw, the frequency is yours and yours alone. No QRM = better listening. -- Bill, W6WRT QSL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00131.html (9,741 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Um, Thanks (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:35:17 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I noticed in his list of the different kind of nets, Ward wisely omitted DX nets. :-) -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW -- The world's top contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00298.html (8,143 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Rules! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 07:20:58 -0700
_________________________________________________________ That was perhaps the funniest line in the whole post. Nothing has ever been settled when it comes to contentious contesting issues. :-) -- Bi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00415.html (8,565 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC's NPRM on BPL -- President's comments (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:05:04 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Mathematically incorrect, granted, but conversationally ok. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00454.html (8,123 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: awesome double dipping, for dummies (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 07:51:43 -0700
_________________________________________________________ This doesn't really do what you think it does. You still have a half wave antenna, but now it is off-center fed. If the matching ability is i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00012.html (8,289 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Lack of Focus? (Was LotW - Needs MoreParticipation) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 07:50:42 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Why? Because the integrity of the ARRL's DXCC program is its big selling point. True, they might be able to find a more user-friendly means,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00214.html (10,777 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] Contesting from the basement (score: 1)
Author: wrt@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Thu Jul 24 07:14:08 2003
_________________________________________________________ Another consideration for any shack, not just a contest shack, is making it convenient. I've found that if I have to go into a separate place
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00263.html (9,136 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vicious CQWW Virus (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 07:36:05 -0700
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:05:45 -0700 (PDT), Craig Cook <n7or@yahoo.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Not so. I create files with two extensions quite often for my ow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00021.html (8,709 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1)
Author: wrt@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Thu Aug 7 07:47:08 2003
_________________________________________________________ In case I don't make it to Dayton, can you just mail me the quarters? -- 73, Bill W7TI
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00152.html (7,709 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1)
Author: wrt@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Fri Aug 8 22:25:12 2003
_________________________________________________________ I believe I heard that in a pileup the other night. :-) -- 73, Bill W7TI
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00179.html (6,896 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] Printing QSL Info on Cards (score: 1)
Author: wrt@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Wed Aug 13 15:46:56 2003
On 13 Aug 2003 12:10:32 -0500, Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Is there any software for printing cards which could, for example,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00248.html (8,339 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Partial Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 07:40:11 -0700
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:26:21 -0400 (EST), Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ I'd like to see rules revised to require a "true" signal report.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00045.html (9,821 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] unique contacts and logging errors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:11:09 -0700
_________________________________________________________ If I was a log checker, I'd ignore uniques UNLESS it made a difference in the standings, and then only if it was for #1 vs #2. In that case,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00139.html (10,679 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Aluminum Towers (Tower Survey) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 07:57:15 -0700
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:35:34 -0700, "Bruce Sawyer" <n6nt@arrl.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ Aluminum is rarely used in it's pure form for any purpose. I'm no m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00282.html (8,204 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:14:28 -0700
_________________________________________________________ The ARRL wasn't always like they are now. Some of us old guys miss those days. -- Bill, W7TI -- The world's top contesters battle it out in F
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00351.html (8,095 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Fee Schedule just released !!! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:26:16 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Better yet, put pressure on your Director. The BOD runs the show. If he doesn't respond the way you like, run for office yourself or campaign
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00368.html (9,369 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW and security (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:31:13 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Someone once posited that one purpose of using the FCC database was to "encourage" hams to keep their FCC info updated. I wouldn't be surpris
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00369.html (8,533 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu