Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldewey@aol.com: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:25:00 -0400 (EDT)
David; I notice that your Q with me was one that did not show up in my log so it made me curious. I checked my log and found the following Q: 0232 K0AD 76 AL MN W7OM 75 DAVID NJ Apparently what must
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00236.html (8,003 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:21:34 -0500 (EST)
Hans; I respectfully disagree with you here. I do user a Call History data base which auto populates, for example, the Check and Section field in SS. However, I ALWAYS copy every exchange that is sen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00112.html (9,122 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW + Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:38:34 -0500 (EST)
I would like to take this opportunity to make a few comments on this subject on behalf of NCJ. When multi-channel band decoders for CW started to show up several years ago, there were strong feelings
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00303.html (14,497 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW + Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:36:24 -0500 (EST)
The intent of the current rule is that multi-channel band decoders , such as CW Skimmer, are allowed as long as they do NOT connect to any external source. For example, you are not allowed to connect
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00315.html (10,882 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] ARRL RTTY RU Plaque (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:50:26 -0500 (EST)
Yesterday, I received my Dakota Division Plaque for the 2010 RTTY Roundup. What a beautiful looking plaque! I would like to than Don Hill, AA5AU for sponsoring it. It is especially meaningful in that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00340.html (6,926 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:01:46 -0500 (EST)
All; I want to thank everyone for the feedback provided on this NAQP CW issue - especially some very thoughtful responses that were sent directly to Bruce and I off the list. Although a number of res
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00369.html (9,150 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about NAQP (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:02:56 -0500 (EST)
Hank; No - the states within Mexico do not count as seperate multipliers in NAQP. If you have other questions about NAQP, my recommendation is that you first check the rules at: http://www.ncjweb.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00157.html (8,416 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] XEs in contest (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:07:41 -0500 (EST)
A few years ago, I had the opportunity to be in Mexico at the same time IARU was going on. I found it was fairly difficult for a U.S. amateur to get a temporary license to operate in Mexico. There wa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00194.html (11,204 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two Single operators, one club call sign (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:35:42 -0500 (EST)
I understood Maarten's original question to be whether he could submit two separate logs (for separate Single Band Operations) using the same call. I believe the answer to that is no but it is always
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00059.html (10,880 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Club Book (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 23:18:18 -0500 (EST)
Jim; I don't know about a book but K4RO's Contesting 101 column in he Sep/Oct, 2010 issue of NCJ addressed this subject. Also check out some of the "Spotlight on Clubs" features that appeared during
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00101.html (7,417 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] win-key ?? (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:09:48 -0400 (EDT)
Dale; 73, Al, K0AD appy Father's Day to you. I'm thinking that I could ask the experts here, so thank you, all you nowledgable folk, for sharing. My family got a new laptop for me, with 3 usb ports b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00114.html (8,068 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & activity (Was: intended consequences) (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:32:57 -0400 (EDT)
One benefit of the current Memorial Day weekend for WPX CW for those of us still working is that it gives you Monday to recover. One can do a full effort in WPX CW and still have a day left to recove
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00200.html (10,252 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] 2011 Minnesota QSO Party Results Available (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:12:43 -0400 (EDT)
The results of the 2011 Minnesota QSO Party are now available at: _http://www.w0aa.org/media/documents/mnqp/MNQP_2011_RESULTS.pdf_ (http://www.w0aa.org/media/documents/mnqp/MNQP_2011_RESULTS.pdf) Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00254.html (7,398 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] Minnesota QSO Party - Saturday, February 4th - 1400Z to 2400Z (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:35:41 -0500 (EST)
Contesters; The Minnesota QSO Party is only a few days away! This increasingly popular QSO party runs this coming Saturday, Feb 4th from 1400Z to 2400Z. A hallmark of MNQP is a large , dedicated corp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00162.html (8,208 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Keyboard for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Alan Dewey <aldewey@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:04:13 -0400 (EDT)
Pete; I don't have a specific suggestion for you but I glad to know that I am not alone with my concern over recent keyboard design provided with desktops. I have two recent DEL desktops at home and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00192.html (9,346 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Impressions of Contesters University and otherContester Dayt... (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:18:56 -0400 (EDT)
I also want to second WC5B's comments. Our hobby has a lot of interest groups (that's what makes it great) but , having gone to Dayton for 4 of the last 5 years, I am convinced that contesters have t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00216.html (10,286 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] To cut or not to cut? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Dewey <aldewey@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
Pete; I agree with you. The cut numbers as part of the serial numbers drove me crazy this weekend. To receive an "A" in the middle of a 4 digit number may save three dashes but I think that time is m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00226.html (9,775 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 14:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
In my opinion, it does not. League general rules for Skimmer like technology refer to MULTI-CHANNEL decoders. If someone is using a CW Reader to help copy CW, we should encourage that. I know a numbe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00052.html (7,018 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:16:53 -0400 (EDT)
Correct me if I'm wrong but PR and VI ARE multipliers in NAQP. Right? What am I missing? 73, Al, K0AD In a message dated 8/11/2012 8:36:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, wn3vaw@verizon.net writes: Other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00144.html (8,428 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big Gun hogging two frequencies (K3KU complaint) (score: 1)
Author: Alan Dewey <aldewey@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:47:10 -0500 (EST)
I lways ask twice if a frequency is open, and it does not take more than en seconds to do that. I think this is the key. I am suprised the number of guys who hear a clear frequency and just jump in a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00094.html (10,591 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu