To: | wn3vaw@verizon.net, jeffrey.embry@gmail.com, geoiii@kkn.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP |
From: | Aldewey@aol.com |
Date: | Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:16:53 -0400 (EDT) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Correct me if I'm wrong but PR and VI ARE multipliers in NAQP. Right? What am I missing? 73, Al, K0AD In a message dated 8/11/2012 8:36:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, wn3vaw@verizon.net writes: Otherwise, one could make a case for PR & VI, as populated US territories within the generally accepted bounds of North America, should also be mults. Is that what you want? Or would that be an unanticipated consequence? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WWDX log checking software glitch ?, Paul Stoetzer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP, George Fremin III |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP, George Fremin III |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP, Paul Stoetzer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |