Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RE\:\s+3\-500Z\s+plate\s+durability\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+RE\:\s+3\-500Z\s+plate\s+durability\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] RE: 3-500Z plate durability... (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:19:10 EST; Hello all, This is a very interesting topic. It seems to me several American amplifier manufacturers are as bad as "used car salesmen" when they tout their 3-500Z amp design. One claims that their's; /archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00172.html (7,069 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] RE: 3-500Z plate durability... (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:47:43 -0800; ** You're right, Todd. When I was a young whippersnapper, John MacDonald, W6SDM, told me that for SSB, it takes c. 10db (1.67 S-units) to make a clearly noticable improvement. Thus, if one runs a pa; /archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00195.html (8,236 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]