Welcome to the lead-free world of RoHS. Your spools of 60/40 solder are NOT
RoHS-compliant...but will likely improve reliability of solder connections
which are subjected to the stresses of expansion/contraction of dissimilar
materials due to thermal excursions. Sn-Pb is more ductile, and as a result
more tolerant of the thermal excursion stresses, than the RoHS-compliant
solders.
73,
Allen--W7GIF
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Allen<mailto:jim.allen@longhornband.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent)
I'm glad you found the fix.
Why is it there are so many re-solder fixes these days. I don't recall ever
hearing about resoldering on the old gear. Anybody ever have to fix a 75A4 or
SX101, etc. by resoldering some connections?
73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Joe Papworth via TenTec
> <tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>> wrote:
>
> It appears to be fixed and in repairing it, I fixed another annoying problem,
> which was spurs and floaters on ten meters only. Those had been plaguing me
> for several years.
>
>
> First, thanks to Paul at Ten Tec for pointing me in the right direction and
> to Mark, K8VF, and others for their suggestions.
>
>
> Paul was right. The problem was on the Xtal Osc/LO board. The repair process
> went like this:
>
>
> 1) I looked at the schematic of the board and saw there are 4 separate xtal
> ? ? oscillators for ten meters (I assume one for each 500 Khz band segment)
> ? ? Since I was losing the entire band, I knew it wasn't one of those
> circuits.?
> ? ? That eliminated a lot of circuitry as a possible cause.
>
>
> 2) After reading the theory of operation, I pretty much narrowed things down
> ? ? to the L9, L10, and L11 circuits, plus the Q4 and Q5 circuits.
>
>
> 3) I resoldered every component in those areas and voila, no more spurs or
> ? ? floaters and so far, RX and TX are fine. (I'm fairly certain the rig would
> ? ? have failed?by?now)
>
>
> Later, Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|