TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] Zepp?

from [Augie "Gus" Hansen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Zepp?
From: "Augie \"Gus\" Hansen" <augie.hansen@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 19:12:55 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 

On 9/13/2014 3:38 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:

...
Final note:  is it 4:1 or 1:4?  Gosh I don't know.
Sevick defined it one way, but the vendors selling these devices call it the
other way.  Let's forget the semantics and specify exactly what we are
talking about: the 50 Ohm side is towards the TX and the 200 Ohm side is
towards the antenna.


BALanced-to-UNbalanced
200-to-50
therefore, in this case, 4:1 balun in anything I write down or say about the device. 

Cheers,
Gus Hansen
KB0YH
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Zepp?, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Zepp?, Bob McGraw - K4TAX
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Zepp?, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Zepp?, Bob McGraw - K4TAX
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]