| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] used gear proces |
| From: | "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:21:52 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I wish I'd not let my Paragon II get away. Oh well, that's water under the
bridge, as they say.
73 Bob, K4TAX----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Bertini" <radioconnection@gmail.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 10:12 AM Subject: [TenTec] used gear proces I paid over $600 for my Paragon II back in 2012. The Paragon II is much more reliable than the earlier Paragons. The VCO board problems were fixed, and the back up battery problems were eliminated when Ten Tec redesigned the uP board to useDallas chips. Cutting one wire opens up the TX for 60 meters and MARS. Thereceiver is general coverage and most hams like the audio. Considering your friend has thematching power supply, and the list of optional filters, I'd be asking fora least $700.00 forthe Paragon gear. The problem is the stigma that results from the poor eHamreviews which are almost entirely based on the issues that plagued the early Paragon models. I use my Paragon side by side along an Omni VI that I bought from Barry on this group. Pete k1zjh _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] OMNI VII, Ed Purvis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] used gear proces, Dave Edwards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] used gear proces, steve jobes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] used gear proces, Dave Edwards |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |